Table 5.
Antenatal visits by selected socio-economic variables
Characteristics | Unadjusted comparison | Multiple logistic regression | ||||
N (% yes¶) | P | OR | 95% CI | P | ||
Slum | Non-slum | 212 (30.7) | 1.00 | |||
Slum | 62 (17.7) | 0.046 | 0.84 | 0.37–1.92 | 0.685 | |
Place of residence | Town/city | 60 (51.7) | 1.00 | |||
Country side | 214 (21.0) | <0.001 | 0.25 | 0.12–0.52 | <0.001 | |
Composite variable of household characteristics | Poor | 84 (10.7) | 1.00 | |||
Not-poor | 190 (35.3) | <0.001 | 1.45 | 0.60–3.48 | 0.407 | |
Composite variable of mass media access | Not at all | 55 (12.7) | 1.00 | |||
At least one media | 219 (31.5) | <0.001 | 1.04 | 0.39–2.76 | 0.941 | |
Education | No education | 77 (6.5) | 1.00 | |||
1–5 years education | 81 (16.0) | 0.059 | 2.44 | 0.79–7.61 | 0.123 | |
6+ years education | 116 (50.0) | <0.001 | 12.11 | 4.08–35.93 | <0.001 |
¶Percentage of adequate (4 or more) antenatal visits