Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Netherlands Heart Journal logoLink to Netherlands Heart Journal
. 2005 Aug;13(7-8):274-278, 279.

The practicing physician's current perspective on therapeutic options in coronary artery disease

DJ Drenth, F Zijlstra, PW Boonstra
PMCID: PMC2497243  PMID: 25696508

Abstract

Over the past decades the management of patients with stable as well as unstable manifestations of coronary artery disease has evolved in every aspect of routine clinical practice. Modern diagnostic modalities allow reliable and objective assessment of both the anatomical and functional consequences of the early as well as advanced stages of this disease, which remains one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Pharmacological therapy now includes several classes of drugs with mortality benefits documented by randomised controlled trials. Surgical and percutaneous revascularisation techniques have shown rapid technical improvements and are now applicable in a wide range of clinical conditions. In this paper we will attempt to place the current status of the three therapeutic options for patients with coronary artery disease into perspective. It is important to realise that it is impossible to write a complete overview, a Pubmed search: 'PCI or drug therapy or surgery for coronary artery disease' results in 1,152,117 hits. Therefore, we have chosen the viewpoint of the practicing physician to synthesise this abundance of information in the context of modern clinical practice in a high volume cardiothoracic and cardiological practice.

Keywords: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)

Full text

PDF
274

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abizaid A., Costa M. A., Centemero M., Abizaid A. S., Legrand V. M., Limet R. V., Schuler G., Mohr F. W., Lindeboom W., Sousa A. G. Clinical and economic impact of diabetes mellitus on percutaneous and surgical treatment of multivessel coronary disease patients: insights from the Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS) trial. Circulation. 2001 Jul 31;104(5):533–538. doi: 10.1161/hc3101.093700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Diegeler Anno, Thiele Holger, Falk Volkmar, Hambrecht Rainer, Spyrantis Niki, Sick Peter, Diederich Klaus W., Mohr Friedrich W., Schuler Gerhard. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 22;347(8):561–566. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drenth Derk J., Veeger Nic J. G. M., Grandjean Jan G., Mariani Massimo A., van Boven Ad J., Boonstra Piet W. Isolated high-grade lesion of the proximal LAD: a stent or off-pump LIMA? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Apr;25(4):567–571. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drenth Derk J., Winter Jobst B., Veeger Nic J. G. M., Monnink Stefan H. J., van Boven Ad J., Grandjean Jan G., Mariani Massimo A., Boonstra Piet W. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting in isolated high-grade stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: six months' angiographic and clinical follow-up of a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Jul;124(1):130–135. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.122525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eagle Kim A., Guyton Robert A., Davidoff Ravin, Edwards Fred H., Ewy Gordon A., Gardner Timothy J., Hart James C., Herrmann Howard C., Hillis L. David, Hutter Adolph M., Jr ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation. 2004 Aug 31;110(9):1168–1176. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138790.14877.7D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibbons Raymond J., Abrams Jonathan, Chatterjee Kanu, Daley Jennifer, Deedwania Prakash C., Douglas John S., Ferguson T. Bruce, Jr, Fihn Stephan D., Fraker Theodore D., Jr, Gardin Julius M. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). Circulation. 2003 Jan 7;107(1):149–158. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000047041.66447.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goy J. J., Kaufmann U., Goy-Eggenberger D., Garachemani A., Hurni M., Carrel T., Gaspardone A., Burnand B., Meier B., Versaci F. A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting to internal mammary artery grafting for proximal, isolated de novo left anterior coronary artery stenosis: the SIMA trial. Stenting vs Internal Mammary Artery. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Nov;75(11):1116–1123. doi: 10.4065/75.11.1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gruentzig A. Results from coronary angioplasty and implications for the future. Am Heart J. 1982 Apr;103(4 Pt 2):779–783. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90486-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Keeley Ellen C., Boura Judith A., Grines Cindy L. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):13–20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Legrand Victor M. G., Serruys Patrick W., Unger Felix, van Hout Ben A., Vrolix Mathias C. M., Fransen Geert M. P., Nielsen Torsten Toftegaard, Paulsen Peter Kildeberg, Gomes Ricardo Seabra, de Queiroz e Melo João M. G. Three-year outcome after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease. Circulation. 2004 Mar 1;109(9):1114–1120. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118504.61212.4B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lemos Pedro A., Saia Francesco, Ligthart Jurgen M. R., Arampatzis Chourmouzios A., Sianos Georgios, Tanabe Kengo, Hoye Angela, Degertekin Muzaffer, Daemen Joost, McFadden Eugene. Coronary restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: morphological description and mechanistic analysis from a consecutive series of cases. Circulation. 2003 Jul 14;108(3):257–260. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000083366.33686.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lemos Pedro A., Serruys Patrick W., van Domburg Ron T., Saia Francesco, Arampatzis Chourmouzios A., Hoye Angela, Degertekin Muzaffer, Tanabe Kengo, Daemen Joost, Liu Tommy K. K. Unrestricted utilization of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with conventional bare stent implantation in the "real world": the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. Circulation. 2003 Dec 22;109(2):190–195. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000109138.84579.FA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Morice Marie-Claude, Serruys Patrick W., Sousa J. Eduardo, Fajadet Jean, Ban Hayashi Ernesto, Perin Marco, Colombo Antonio, Schuler G., Barragan Paul, Guagliumi Giulio. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 6;346(23):1773–1780. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Moses Jeffrey W., Leon Martin B., Popma Jeffrey J., Fitzgerald Peter J., Holmes David R., O'Shaughnessy Charles, Caputo Ronald P., Kereiakes Dean J., Williams David O., Teirstein Paul S. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 2;349(14):1315–1323. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mueller R. L., Rosengart T. K., Isom O. W. The history of surgery for ischemic heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Mar;63(3):869–878. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(96)01375-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nashef S. A., Roques F., Michel P., Gauducheau E., Lemeshow S., Salamon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Jul;16(1):9–13. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00134-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Neri Roberto, Migliorini Angela, Moschi Guia, Valenti Renato, Dovellini Emilio Vincenzo, Antoniucci David. Percutaneous reperfusion of left main coronary disease complicated by acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 May;56(1):31–34. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Orlic Dejan, Bonizzoni Erminio, Stankovic Goran, Airoldi Flavio, Chieffo Alaide, Corvaja Nicola, Sangiorgi Giuseppe, Ferraro Massimo, Briguori Carlo, Montorfano Matteo. Treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: immediate and mid-term results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Apr 7;43(7):1154–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pfisterer Matthias, Buser Peter, Osswald Stefan, Allemann Urs, Amann Wolfgang, Angehrn Walter, Eeckhout Eric, Erne Paul, Estlinbaum Werner, Kuster Gabriela. Outcome of elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary artery disease with an invasive vs optimized medical treatment strategy: one-year results of the randomized TIME trial. JAMA. 2003 Mar 5;289(9):1117–1123. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.9.1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Serruys P. W., Unger F., Sousa J. E., Jatene A., Bonnier H. J., Schönberger J. P., Buller N., Bonser R., van den Brand M. J., van Herwerden L. A. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med. 2001 Apr 12;344(15):1117–1124. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104123441502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith S. C., Jr, Dove J. T., Jacobs A. K., Kennedy J. W., Kereiakes D., Kern M. J., Kuntz R. E., Popma J. J., Schaff H. V., Williams D. O. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2001 Jun 19;103(24):3019–3041. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.24.3019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tan W. A., Tamai H., Park S. J., Plokker H. W., Nobuyoshi M., Suzuki T., Colombo A., Macaya C., Holmes D. R., Jr, Cohen D. J. Long-term clinical outcomes after unprotected left main trunk percutaneous revascularization in 279 patients. Circulation. 2001 Oct 2;104(14):1609–1614. doi: 10.1161/hc3901.096669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zijlstra F., Hoorntje J. C., de Boer M. J., Reiffers S., Miedema K., Ottervanger J. P., van 't Hof A. W., Suryapranata H. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 4;341(19):1413–1419. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911043411901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Netherlands Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES