Table 2. Subdomain coupling on the most-involved low-frequency modes.

Functional state	Mode #	Motor	N	U50	L50	C	Subdomain coupling
Rigor-like	13	0.31	0.29	0.13	0.14	0.01	N/U50/L50
	10	0.23	0.05	0.23	0.17	−0.08	U50/L50
	15	0.21	−0.07	−0.24	0.02	−0.09	U50
	8	0.20	−0.06	−0.06	−0.16	−0.15	L50/C
	14	0.20	−0.12	0.01	−0.18	−0.10	N/L50
	12	0.19	0.14	0.06	0.15	−0.02	N/L50
	9	0.18	0.12	0.17	0.08	−0.02	N/U50
	21	0.17	−0.04	0.08	0.15	0.19	L50/C
	18	0.15	−0.20	−0.07	0.12	−0.09	N
	11	0.15	−0.06	−0.13	0.04	−0.17	U50/C
	7	0.12	−0.12	−0.13	0.02	0.07	N/U50
	16	0.11	−0.16	0.14	0.12	0.08	U50/L50
	17	0.09	−0.20	0.02	0.14	−0.14	N/C
Post-rigor	8	0.35	0.15	0.21	0.25	0.06	N/U50/L50
	13	0.33	−0.19	−0.20	−0.20	0.02	N/U50/L50
	7	0.28	0.13	0.21	0.08	0.04	N/U50
	15	0.23	0.05	0.25	−0.04	0.16	U50/C
	24	0.17	−0.17	−0.03	−0.03	−0.09	N
	21	0.15	0.15	−0.11	−0.29	−0.09	L50
	16	0.11	0.12	−0.10	0.11	0.12	N/C

Rigor-like and post-rigor involvement coefficients relative to the motor domain and the individual subdomains sorted by their contribution to the transition of the motor domain (aa 61–762). The coupling between the individual subdomains along the most involved normal modes is given, as deduced by the analysis of the signed involvement coefficients.