Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1992 May;74(3):169–171.

Peripheral pulse palpation: an unreliable physical sign.

S Brearley 1, C P Shearman 1, M H Simms 1
PMCID: PMC2497570  PMID: 1616258

Abstract

Fifty observers, including two fully trained vascular surgeons, were asked to determine the presence or absence of the femoral and distal pulses of four patients with peripheral vascular disease and one asymptomatic subject (50 pulses assessed). Pulses felt by both vascular surgeons were deemed to be palpable. Among the other observers, the sensitivity of palpation was 95% or over for the femoral pulse, but 33% to 60% for observers of varying experience feeling for the posterior tibial pulse. Up to 20% false-positive observations were reported. Disease was diagnosed in over 10% of examinations of healthy limbs and was missed in over 10% of symptomatic limbs. The accuracy of pulse palpation was strongly correlated with the systolic blood pressure in the underlying artery. Accuracy was greater among more experienced observers, suggesting that careful teaching of this skill is likely to be beneficial. Even so, pulse palpation alone is an unreliable physical sign and should only be used in combination with objective measurements as a guide to clinical management.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. LUDBROOK J., CLARKE A. M., McKENZIE J. K. Significance of absent ankle pulse. Br Med J. 1962 Jun 23;1(5294):1724–1726. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5294.1724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lawson I. R., Ingman S. R., Masih Y., Freeman B. Reliability of palpation of pedal pulses as ascertained by the kappa statistic. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1980 Jul;28(7):300–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1980.tb00619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Meade T. W., Gardner M. J., Cannon P., Richardson P. C. Observer variability in recording the peripheral pulses. Br Heart J. 1968 Sep;30(5):661–665. doi: 10.1136/hrt.30.5.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Myers K. A., Scott D. F., Devine T. J., Johnston A. H., Denton M. J., Gilfillan I. S. Palpation of the femoral and popliteal pulses: a study of the accuracy as assessed by agreement between multiple observers. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1987 Aug;1(4):245–249. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(87)80075-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nuzzaci G., Giuliano G., Righi D., Baroncelli T., Lotti A., Marinoni M. A study of the semeiological reliability of dorsalis pedis artery and posterior tibial artery in the diagnosis of lower limb arterial occlusive disease. Angiology. 1984 Dec;35(12):767–772. doi: 10.1177/000331978403501203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Robertson G. S., Ristic C. D., Bullen B. R. The incidence of congenitally absent foot pulses. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990 Mar;72(2):99–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES