Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 31;337:a605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a605

Table 2.

 Distribution of key exposures in participants who completed clinic questionnaires at follow-up in Hyderabad nutrition trial. Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise

Characteristic Intervention area (n=633) Control area (n=498) P value*
Mean (SD) age (years) 15.8 (0.9) 15.9 (0.9) 0.02
Male 333 (53) 274 (55) 0.4
Pubertal stage†: (n=628) (n=496) 0.4
 Early puberty 88 (14) 83 (17)
 Middle puberty 209 (33) 156 (31)
 Late puberty 184 (29) 132 (27)
 Post-puberty 147 (23) 125 (25)
Standard of living index: (n=630) 0.2
 High (25-67) 228 (36) 158 (32)
 Medium (15-24) 291 (46) 239 (48)
 Low (0-14) 111 (18) 101 (20)
Own occupation‡: (n=497) 0.002
 Student/vocational training 534 (84) 391 (79)
 Employed 66 (10) 53 (11)
 Unemployed/housework 33 (5) 53 (11)
Literate mother§ 58 (9) 57 (11) 0.2
Lifestyle: (n=497)
 Consumed tobacco (ever) 0 2 (0) 0.2
 Consumed alcohol (ever) 0 2 (0) 0.2

*P values are based on unpaired t tests or χ2 tests for heterogeneity with appropriate degrees of freedom.

†Pubertal stage for boys: intervention area—early 27%, middle 56%, late 18%, post-puberty 0%; control area—early 30%, middle 50%, late 19%, post-puberty 0%. Pubertal stage for girls: intervention area—early 0%, middle 8%, late 42%, post-puberty 50%; control area—early 0%, middle 9%, late 35%, post-puberty 56%.

‡Vocational training, n=15; unemployed, n=36.

§Literate/primary school, n=45; middle school, n=43; high school, n=16; intermediate level, n=9; graduate, n=2.