Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 31;337:a605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a605

Table 3.

 Distribution of outcome variables by area of intervention at follow-up in Hyderabad nutrition trial

No Mean (SD) Mean difference* (95% CI) (control minus intervention)
Intervention Control
Body size and composition
Height (mm) 1120 1559 (83) 1549 (82) −10.0 (−18.7 to −1.4); P=0.024
Body mass index (kg/m2) 1120 17.1 (2.0) 17.3 (2.4) 0.27 (−0.08 to 0.61); P=0.1
Fat mass index (kg/m2) 1120 2.6 (1.3) 2.6 (1.5) −0.02 (−0.23 to 0.19); P=0.8
Fat-free mass index (kg/m2) 1120 14.5 (1.4) 14.8 (1.6) 0.29 (0.01 to 0.57); P=0.043
Central-peripheral skinfold ratio 1120 1.48 (0.25) 1.47 (0.25) −0.01 (−0.06 to 0.05); P=0.8
Cardiovascular physiology
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 1118 108.7 (10.3) 109.6 (10.0) 0.83 (−1.44 to 3.11); P=0.5
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 1118 62.5 (6.5) 62.2 (6.5) −0.23 (−1.70 to 1.25); P=0.8
Augmentation index (%) 862 2.5 (11.4) 5.6 (9.1) 3.16 (0.8 to 5.51); P=0.011
Lipid profile
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 1050 3.45 (0.69) 3.45 (0.67) −0.00 (−0.12 to 0.12); P=1.0
LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 1050 2.05 (0.60) 2.04 (0.59) −0.02 (−0.13 to 0.09); P=0.8
HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 1050 0.99 (0.23) 1.00 (0.22) 0.01 (−0.05 to 0.06); P=0.7
Triglycerides† (mmol/l) 1050 0.82 (0.39 to 1.72) 0.83 (0.40 to 1.74) 0.02 (−0.04 to 0.07); P=0.6
Glucose homeostasis
Glucose (mmol/l) 1008 4.68 (0.58) 4.72 (0.74) 0.03 (−0.23 to 0.29); P=0.8
Insulin† (mU/l) 1008 15.36 (5.07 to 46.52) 18.45 (6.37 to 53.41) 0.18 (0.03 to 0.33); P=0.02
HOMA score† 1003 3.16 (1.00 to 10.00) 3.79 (1.22 to 11.73) 0.18 (0.04 to 0.32); P=0.015

HDL=high density lipoprotein; HOMA=homoeostasis modal assessment; LDL=low density lipoprotein.

*Based on linear regression models with robust standard errors.

†Values for intervention and control areas are geometric means and 95% reference ranges; mean differences are on log scale.