Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr;4(2):337–344. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s1209

Table 3.

Cardiovascular endpoints in studies of selective COX2 inhibitors

Drug (reference) Study Aspirin allowed CV endpoints Hazard ratios or incidence of CV endpoints

All No aspirin On aspirin
Rofecoxib (Bombardier 2000) VIGOR No MI 4.25 (1.39−17.37) Idem Excluded
CV death c0.2% vs 0.2%, NS Idem Excluded
Celecoxib (Silverstein 2000) CLASS Yes MI, stroke or angina 0.9% vs 1.0%, NS 0.5% vs 0.4%, NS nr
Etoricoxib (Cannon 2006; Laine 2007) MEDAL Stimulated aAny thrombotic events 0.95 (0.81−1.11) d1.0% vs 1.0%, NS d1.67% vs 1.87%, NS
aArterial thrombotic events 0.96 (0.81−1.13) nr nr
a,bAPTC (all MI, stroke or vascular death) 0.96 (0.79−1.16) nr nr
Lumiracoxib (Schnitzer 2004; Farkouh 2004) TARGET Yes bAPTC (all MI, stroke or vascular death)
 vs ibuprofen + naproxen 1.14 (0.78–1.66) 1.22 (0.74–2.02) 1.04 (0.59–1.84)
 vs ibuprofen 0.76 (0.41–1.40) 0.94 (0.44–2.04) 0.56 (0.20–1.54)
 vs naproxen 1.46 (0.89–2.37) 1.49 (0.76–2.92) 1.42 (0.70–2.90)
Confirmed or probable MI (clinical and silent)
 vs ibuprofen + naproxen 1.31 (0.70–2.45) 1.47 (0.63–3.39) 1.14 (0.44–2.95)
 vs ibuprofen 0.66 (0.21–2.09) 0.75 (0.20–2.79) 0.47 (0.04–5.14)
 vs naproxen 1.77 (0.82–3.84) 2.37 (0.74–7.55) 1.36 (0.47–3.93)
a

Per-protocol analysis, similar results after ITT analysis.

b

APTC, Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration endpoint.

c

incidence.

d

events per 100 patient yrs.

Abbreviations: nr, not reported.