Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov 4;7(1):15–25. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0019-2

Table 3.

Results of three-way ANOVA for normalized masked threshold shift patterns

Treatment factor Masker Set A Masker Set B
dF Res F p dF Res F p
Probe location 9 180 12.294 <0.001 9 120 15.436 <0.001
Electrode configuration 2 180 11.492 <0.001 1 120 15.131 <0.001
Stimulation level 2 180 5.206 0.006 2 120 1.588 0.209
Probe location × Electrode configuration 18 180 2.089 0.008 9 120 11.726 <0.001
Probe location × Stimulation level 18 180 0.319 0.997 18 120 0.254 0.999
Electrode configuration × Stimulation level 4 180 1.042 0.387 2 120 1.681 0.191
Probe location × Electrode configuration × Stimulation level 36 180 0.178 0.999 18 120 0.567 0.916

Treatment factors included electrode configuration, stimulation level and probe location. Statistically significant effects are shown in bold type.