Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 23;466(4):963–968. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0115-9

Table 3.

Results of the variable used to assess performance and Spearman’s rho correlation test for each set of results against the surgeon’s experience

Surgeon Noise/Task features (%) Task features versus total time (seconds) Standard deviation of torque magnitude for task features (mNm) Standard deviation of task feature duration (seconds)
1 (expert) 215.53 2.01 86.32 0.37
2 (expert) 310.33 3.22 81.06 0.37
3 (trainee) 375.03 3.35 100.09 0.33
4 (trainee) 399.76 4.17 96.29 0.28
5 (trainee) 539.13 4.66 57.16 0.26
Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient 1.000* 1.000* −0.200 −0.974*

*Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).