Table 3.
Results of the variable used to assess performance and Spearman’s rho correlation test for each set of results against the surgeon’s experience
Surgeon | Noise/Task features (%) | Task features versus total time (seconds) | Standard deviation of torque magnitude for task features (mNm) | Standard deviation of task feature duration (seconds) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 (expert) | 215.53 | 2.01 | 86.32 | 0.37 |
2 (expert) | 310.33 | 3.22 | 81.06 | 0.37 |
3 (trainee) | 375.03 | 3.35 | 100.09 | 0.33 |
4 (trainee) | 399.76 | 4.17 | 96.29 | 0.28 |
5 (trainee) | 539.13 | 4.66 | 57.16 | 0.26 |
Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient | 1.000* | 1.000* | −0.200 | −0.974* |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).