Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 10;466(2):294–299. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0056-8

Table 2.

Comparison of posterior approaches according to the treatment of the external rotators

Variable The ERP group (A) The repair group (B) The no-repair group (C) p Value Duncan
Surgical factors
Operation time (minutes)* 91.1 ± 8 90.1 ± 11.6 81.2 ± 14.1 < 0.001 A,B > C
Postoperative blood loss (mL)* 718.7 ± 258.6 745.8 ± 234 736.6 ± 209.1 0.465
Radiographic evaluation
Cup anteversion (degrees)* 11.5 ± 5.7 15.3 ± 5.5 15 ± 4.9 < 0.001 B,C > A
Cup inclination (degrees)* 43.2 ± 3.5 42.2 ± 3.6 42.5 ± 3.7 0.013 A > B
Stem malposition 3 3 4
Clinical evaluation
Preoperative Harris hip scores* 50.1 ± 11.5 42.4 ± 12.5 46.7 ± 10.8 0.019 A > B
1-year postoperative Harris hip scores* 97 ± 2.9 94.9 ± 3.4 94.2 ± 3.2 < 0.001 A > B,C
Complications
Dislocation rate (%)* 0/220 (0) 11/282 (3.9) 9/168 (5.3) 0.004
Infection 0 1 0
Nerve palsy 0 1 2

*Mean ± standard deviation; ERP = external rotator preservation.