Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 10;466(3):684–690. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0077-3

Table 1.

Error analysis by virtual simulation

Difference in opening angle between radiographs Anteversion Error (mm)
No error correction applied Error correction applied
10° 0° and 10° 0.18 (0.15–0.27) 0.10 (0–0.27)
10° and 20° 0.45* 0.10 (0–0.27)
20° and 30° 0.74* 0.10 (0–0.27)
30° and 40° 1.00* 0.10 (0–0.27)
40° and 50° 1.23* 0.10 (0–0.27)
50° and 60° 1.43* 0.10 (0–0.27)
60° and 70° 1.58* 0.10 (0–0.27)
Mean 0.94 0.10
20° 0° and 20° 0.60* 0.10 (0–0.27)
10° and 30° 1.19* 0.10 (0–0.27)
20° and 40° 1.74* 0.10 (0–0.27)
30° and 50° 2.23* 0.10 (0–0.27)
40° and 60° 2.66* 0.10 (0–0.27)
50° and 70° 3.01* 0.10 (0–0.27)
Mean 1.91 0.10
30° 0° and 30° 1.34* 0.10 (0–0.27)
10° and 40° 2.19* 0.10 (0–0.27)
20° and 50° 2.97* 0.10 (0–0.27)
30° and 60° 3.66* 0.10 (0–0.27)
40° and 70° 4.24* 0.10 (0–0.27)
Mean 2.88 0.10
Overall mean 1.80 0.10

Each given error is a mean of the absolute errors at 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° out-of-plane wear, thus indicating the degree of failure to meet the model assumption of using the correct plane of wear; *all values were equal in this series.