Table 1.
Calculated percentage B6 allele in cDNA and gDNA
| Maternal B6 | Paternal B6 | ANOVA | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cDNA | gDNA | CDNA | gDNA | Tukey post-hoc P | |||||||||||
| Gene | Mb | Avg | SD | Avg | SD | Avg | SD | Avg | SD | imprint | strain (mat) | strain (pat) | Rank | Ref 1 | Ref 2 |
| Camk2b* | 5.9 | 44.4 | 1.5 | 50.4 | 2.3 | 42.6 | 0.8 | 49.7 | 1.5 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 4 | P | ||
| Ikzf1* | 11.6 | 45.5 | 3.3 | 48.2 | 1.9 | 45.6 | 3.8 | 46.1 | 3.0 | 10 | M | P | |||
| Grb10* | 11.9 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 57.6 | 2.4 | 98.3 | 1.4 | 56.8 | 4.7 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | P | ||
| 5730522E02Rik | 25.5 | 30.7 | 6.0 | 49.4 | 5.8 | 36.7 | 3.0 | 49.6 | 2.4 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 16 | M | ||
| Ccdc85a (1133) | 28.3 | 54.5 | 2.9 | 54.5 | 1.5 | 52.7 | 1.7 | 51.1 | 1.9 | 6 | P | ||||
| Ccdc85a (1134) | 28.3 | 54.5 | 3.5 | 51.4 | 3.1 | 56.2 | 1.5 | 52.7 | 1.8 | 6 | P | ||||
| Spnb2 | 30.0 | 53.7 | 1.2 | 54.1 | 1.5 | 53.6 | 0.7 | 54.6 | 1.5 | M | |||||
| Asb3 | 30.9 | 56.6 | 1.4 | 51.9 | 1.1 | 57.8 | 1.5 | 53.7 | 1.2 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | M | |||
| Havcr2 | 46.3 | 48.6 | 3.0 | 54.8 | 1.0 | 48.6 | 2.0 | 54.1 | 1.2 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 3 | M | ||
| Sgcd*† | 47.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 52.4 | 0.7 | 47.8 | 7.8 | 52.2 | 1.4 | 23 | M | ||||
| Gria1†† | 57.4 | 58.2 | 1.9 | 54.1 | 2.1 | 48.1 | 14.8 | 55.3 | 1.9 | 17 | M | ||||
| Zfp39 | 58.7 | 54.7 | 1.3 | 54.8 | 1.2 | 53.5 | 1.1 | 54.7 | 1.8 | 22 | P | ||||
| Rasd1 | 59.8 | 50.1 | 1.9 | 51.7 | 1.4 | 49.5 | 1.3 | 50.4 | 1.1 | M | |||||
| Map2k3 | 60.7 | 49.7 | 0.7 | 58.7 | 3.6 | 49.3 | 0.6 | 55.5 | 2.0 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | P | |||
| Map2k4 | 65.5 | 53.0 | 1.3 | 55.6 | 1.3 | 51.6 | 3.7 | 52.4 | 5.5 | P | |||||
| Trp53 | 69.7 | 82.6 | 4.7 | 52.7 | 3.1 | 83.2 | 2.1 | 58.7 | 2.3 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | P | |||
| Serpinf1 | 75.2 | 49.5 | 1.1 | 51.4 | 1.9 | 49.8 | 1.9 | 50.6 | 1.3 | P | |||||
| Crk* | 75.5 | 54.4 | 0.8 | 54.6 | 1.5 | 54.8 | 0.5 | 53.3 | 1.2 | M | |||||
| Nf1 | 79.6 | 53.5 | 1.8 | 50.3 | 3.3 | 53.8 | 2.2 | 52.3 | 2.6 | ||||||
| Rasl10b* | 83.2 | 37.8 | 2.2 | 53.5 | 3.2 | 37.7 | 1.5 | 54.5 | 0.7 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | M | |||
| Itga3 | 94.9 | 48.0 | 2.0 | 53.3 | 2.1 | 49.8 | 1.0 | 54.9 | 1.3 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | P | |||
| Nxph3 | 95.3 | 53.4 | 1.2 | 53.0 | 1.5 | 53.5 | 1.1 | 54.5 | 2.1 | 25 | M | ||||
| Hoxb5* | 96.1 | 50.2 | 9.7 | 52.6 | 1.2 | 47.6 | 7.0 | 52.4 | 2.0 | P | |||||
| Cbx1 | 96.6 | 51.0 | 3.2 | 52.9 | 0.7 | 49.5 | 3.0 | 53.8 | 1.6 | P | |||||
| Pparbp (1151)* | 98.0 | 52.5 | 2.0 | 50.6 | 1.8 | 51.7 | 0.8 | 52.0 | 0.8 | P | |||||
| Pparbp (1152)* | 98.0 | 56.3 | 1.0 | 56.7 | 0.9 | 54.4 | 1.6 | 57.0 | 1.5 | < 0.01 | P | ||||
| Igfbp4 (1149) | 98.9 | 51.7 | 1.7 | 55.2 | 2.8 | 53.2 | 1.6 | 55.2 | 3.1 | P | |||||
| Igfbp4 (1150) | 98.9 | 51.7 | 1.1 | 50.7 | 0.8 | 51.8 | 1.6 | 50.5 | 0.5 | P | |||||
| Smarce1 | 99.0 | 51.3 | 1.4 | 54.0 | 0.8 | 51.5 | 1.4 | 53.6 | 1.5 | < 0.05 | M | ||||
| Jup | 100.2 | 51.5 | 1.1 | 51.4 | 0.8 | 52.7 | 1.8 | 50.8 | 1.5 | 24 | M | ||||
| Stat3 | 100.7 | 53.6 | 4.5 | 49.3 | 1.8 | 52.9 | 1.1 | 49.7 | 1.2 | M | |||||
| Atp6v0a1 | 100.8 | 52.8 | 0.8 | 53.3 | 1.1 | 53.3 | 1.8 | 53.7 | 1.2 | ||||||
| Cntnap1* | 101.0 | 37.7 | 3.1 | 53.8 | 7.5 | 40.4 | 4.4 | 61.4 | 6.1 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 7 | M | ||
| Meox1*† | 101.7 | 32.9 | 12.2 | 40.5 | 3.8 | 42.3 | 13.0 | 41.8 | 5.1 | P | |||||
| Nbr1 | 102.0 | 48.7 | 3.2 | 48.7 | 2.3 | 48.5 | 0.8 | 48.6 | 3.0 | P | |||||
| IMPACT*†† | chr 18 | 6.3 | 4.7 | 43.8 | 2.5 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 45.8 | 2.5 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |||
*
outlier removed (Grubbs test)
†
expression below level of reliable detection
††
low amplification of genomic DNA
P (imprint) is post hoc comparison of %B6 in maternal cDNA to %B6 in paternal cDNA
P (strain (mat)) is post hoc comparison of %B6 in maternal cDNA to %B6 in maternal gDNA
P (strain (pat)) is post hoc comparison of %B6 in paternal cDNA to %B6 in paternal gDNA
Rank indicates the P value ranking for genes on chromosome 11 predicted to be imprinted by Luedi et al, 2005, with 1 being the lowest P value and 28 being the highest P value.
Ref 1: Luedi et al 2005
Ref 2: Nikaido et al 2003