Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar;1(1):28–35. doi: 10.1593/tlo.07103

Table 3.

Differential CIMP and CDH1 Methylation Patterns during Stepwise Gastrocarcinogenesis and Their Correlation with Patients' Personal Parameters.

Parameters No. CIMP P CDH1*
Methylation (%)
P

H (%) L (%) N (%)
Gender
Male 34 16 (47.1) 13 (38.2) 5 (14.7) .317 16 (47.1) .108
Female 13 8 (61.5) 5 (38.5) 0 (0) 7 (53.8)
Age (years)
< 50 12 4 (33.4) 7 (58.3) 1 (8.3) .154 2 (16.7) .010
≥ 50 35 20 (57.2) 11 (31.4) 4 (11.4) 21 (60)
Histology
Noncancerous 16 0 (0) 12 (75) 4 (25) .001 4 (25) .031
Premalignant 21 5 (23.8) 15 (71.4) 1 (4.8) 5 (23.8)
Cancer 47 24 (51.1) 18 (38.3) 5 (10.6) 23 (48.9)
d-GC 27 16 (59.3) 8 (29.6) 3 (11.1) .282 16 (59.3) .100
i-GC 20 8 (40) 10 (50) 2 (10) 7 (35)
Differentiation
Poor 32 16 (50) 13 (40.6) 3 (9.4) .236 19 (59.4) .335
Well 7 4 (57.1) 2 (28.6) 1 (14.3) 2 (28.6)
Lymph node
metastasis
+ 30 15 (50) 11 (36.7) 4 (13.3) .435 19 (63.3) .028
- 10 5 (50) 5 (50) 0 (0) 2 (20)
H. pylori infection
+ 8 3 (37.5) 3 (37.5) 2 (25) .079 3 (37.5) .112
- 5 5 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (80)
*

Significant difference of CDH1 methylation incidences between CIMP-H and CIMP-L/N groups (Spearman relative analysis, P = .000).