Skip to main content
. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14848–14853. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14848

Table 1.

Modulation of cGMP levels in NANC relaxation

Treatment cGMP, fmol/mg
Wild type HO-2Δ/Δ nNOSΔ/Δ
Unstimulated
 Control 817  ±  89.7 450  ±  49.2* 603  ±  51.7*
 SnPP-IX 10−5 M 787  ±  56.3 472  ±  24.3 589  ±  47.6
 L-NNA 10−4 M 840  ±  69.7 415  ±  32.9 615  ±  42.3
 ODQ 10−5 M 553  ±  48.3 302  ±  21.8 438  ±  31.9
DMPP-stimulated
 Control 1785  ±  165 602  ±  62.7* 931  ±  73.8*
 SnPP-IX 10−5 M 1271  ±  88.5 588  ±  43.9 326  ±  38.9
 L-NNA 10−4 M 1006  ±  69.6 198  ±  21.6 822  ±  66.7
 ODQ 10−5 M 603  ±  57.8 389  ±  27.3 467  ±  32.1
 CO 10−3 M 1960  ±  143 2100  ±  187 2050  ±  225
 SNP 10−4 M 2197  ±  178 2267  ±  209 2003  ±  126

Ileal muscle strips were treated with DMPP (3 × 10−5 M) for 30 s and instantaneously frozen. cGMP content was determined by radioimmunassay as described in Materials and Methods

*

Significant difference between knockout and control values. P < 0.01, Student’s t test. 

Significant reduction by SnPP-IX, P < 0.01, Student’s t test. 

Significant reduction by L-NNA, P < 0.01, Student’s t test.