Table 2.
The effect of the various patterns of breast cancer in the family on the age of onset of breast cancer in the women under study (univariate) *
| Family characteristics |
Relative risk at age 30** |
95% C.I. relative risk at of age 30 |
Change of relative risk per 10 years *** |
Overall Significance **** |
| ≥ 2 cases of female breast cancer in first or second-degree relatives (yes vs. no) | 2.20 | 1.15–4.22 | 0.851 | P = .013 |
| ≥ 2 cases of female breast cancer in first-degree relatives (yes vs. no) | 4.28 | 1.89–9.70 | 0.624 | P = .001 |
| ≥ 1 case of female breast cancer under age 50 (yes vs. no) | 2.82 | 1.43–5.57 | 0.800 | P = .001 |
| ≥ 2 cases of female breast cancer under age 50 (yes vs. no) | 5.81 | 2.16–15.60 | 0.825 | P = .002 |
| ≥ 1 case of female breast cancer under age 40 (yes vs. no) | 3.21 | 1.36–7.56 | 0.825 | P = .001 |
| Bilateral breast cancer in affected sister (index patient) (yes vs. no) | 4.00 | 1.55–10.32 | 0.784 | P = .000 |
| Ovarian cancer (yes vs. no) | 2.72 | 0.58–12.83 | 0.801 | P = .294 |
| DCIS in affected sister (index patient) (yes vs. no) | 0.89 | 0.30–2.63 | 1.184 | P = .412 |
* Due to small numbers, results regarding ≥ 2 cases under age 40 and ≥ 1 or 2 case under age 30 of female breast cancer, male breast cancer, breast and ovarian cancer in one person and prostate cancer under age 60 are not presented.
** Due to low prevalence, the hazard ratio can be considered as a relative risk.
*** The relative risk at age 30 can be multiplied with this factor for calculating the relative risk at age 40, age 50 and so on.
**** Model significance was based on the likelihood ratio of the final model as compared to the O-model without any covariate.