Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Learn Motiv. 2007;38(4):342–357. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2007.02.001

Table 3.

The number of images selected before cashing-out by each animal in each condition of Experiment 2, and the results of individual analyses conducted on those data.

Subject
Condition Statistic Chewie Gale Luke Obi
Short delay, Low effort N 179 180 180 180
N Correct 174 169 173 155
% 1 0 0 1 0
% 2 0 0 0 0
% 3 1 0 0 3
% 4 99 100 99 97

Short delay, High effort N 175 179 176 180
N Correct 131 175 107 158
% 1 2 0 3 3
% 2 2 1 2 1
% 3 8 0 19 17
% 4 88 99 77 79

Long delay, Low effort N 178 173 199 179
N Correct 166 114 191 166
% 1 35 0 94 1
% 2 0 0 4 8
% 3 2 3 1 74
% 4 63 97 2 18

Long delay, High effort N 179 176 180 180
N Correct 132 130 166 169
% 1 6 2 92 5
% 2 4 5 7 78
% 3 14 14 2 16
% 4 76 79 0 2

Results (simple main effects) FDelay X Effort 7.091* 2.900 4.526* 15.994*
df, N 1, 122 1,99 1, 130 1, 131
η2 0.057 0.030 0.033 0.112

FDelay 16.148* 4.298* 1102.532* 47.564*
df, N 1, 122 1,99 1, 130 1, 131
η2 0.12 0.043 0.897 0.272

FEffort 2.686 4.333* 3.213 198.920*
df, N 1, 122 1,99 1, 130 1, 131
η2 0.022 0.044 0.025 0.610

FDelay (low) 25.221* 0.083 758.059* 4.163*
df, N 1, 68 1, 57 1, 75 1, 65

FDelay (high) 0.824 6.070* 411.059* 59.853*
df, N 1, 54 1, 42 1, 55 1, 66

FEffort (short) 0.520 0.066 6.370* 49.169*
df, N 1, 61 1, 49 1, 56 1, 63

FEffort (long) 9.325* 7.852* 0.044 170.387*
df, N 1, 61 1, 50 1, 74 1. 68
*

Significant at p < 0.05.