Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2005 Sep 27;44(38):12896–12904. doi: 10.1021/bi050762c

Table 2.

Effects of the Tet(L) and Tet(K) mutations on protein assembly into the membrane and Tc-resistance in E. coli DH5αa

Tet(L) or
Tet(K)
Location of mutation Protein property %
Membrane
Assemblyb
MIC of
Tcc
(μg/ml)

- - None
(vector control)
- 2
Tet(L) None Wild-type 100 30
Motif B, TMS IV R110Cd 18 2
R110K 82 4
Motif C, TMS V E152C 30 2
E152D 49 12
E152Qd 98 3
G155A 134 16
G155C 100 8
G155S 152 8
P156A 60 2
P156C 94 2
P156G 121 2
Motif H, TMS VI P175A 89 8
P175Cd 88 16
P175G 74 16
TMS X P301G NDe >32
P301S 86 2
G302A 76 8
G302C 62 2
T303A 66 8
TMS XIII G398C 80 16
G400C 73 8
G405C 60 2
G406C 65 8

Tet(K) Motif C, TMS V Wild-type 100 12
G155C 105 4
G155S 88 8
P156C 98 2
a

All values are the average of duplicate determinations in at least two independent experiments, with standard deviations ≤15% of the mean.

b

Percentage of the wild-type values (set at 100) as evaluated by Western analyses.

c

MIC is minimal Tc concentration at which there was no growth of the E. coli DH5α transformant after a 15-h incubation in rich medium (41).

d

These values have been reported previously , and are shown here for comparison.

e

Not determined.