. 2008 Aug;179(4):1845–1860. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.087940

TABLE 4.

Pedigree analysis of DSB repair in pol32Δ strains

Classes of mother–daughter pairs	No. of mother–daughter pairs	No. (%) (observed phenotypes)
Classes of mother–daughter pairs	No. of mother–daughter pairs			One viable colony	Two viable colonies
Pairs with at least one Ade⁺ colony	44	17 (38.6)	27 (61.4)
Pairs with at least one Ade⁺ colony		(17 Ade⁺:dead)	(1 Ade⁺:Ade⁺; 18 Ade⁺:Ade^−r;
			6 Ade⁺:Ade^+/−r; 1 Ade⁺:Ade^−w;
			1 Ade⁺:Ade^−w/−r)
Pairs with only chromosome loss (Ade^−r)	96	30 (31.2)	66 (68.8)
Pairs with only chromosome loss (Ade^−r)		(30 Ade^−r:dead)	(66 Ade^−r:Ade^−r)
Other	109	14 (12.8)	95 (87.2)
		(8 Ade^+/−r:dead; 3 Ade^−w:dead;	(53 Ade^−r:Ade^+/−r; 11 Ade^−r:Ade^−w;
		2 Ade^−w/−r:dead; 1 Ade^+/−w:dead)	8 Ade^−r:Ade^−w/−r; 4 Ade^−r:Ade^+/−w;
			13 Ade^+/−r:Ade^+/−r; 2 Ade^−w:Ade^−w;
			2 Ade^+/−r:Ade^−w; 1 Ade^−w/−r:Ade^−w/−r;
			1 Ade^+/−r:Ade^−w/−r)
Total	249	61 (24.5)	188 (75.5)

Data are pooled from analyses of two isogenic pol32Δ strains, AM1014 and AM1152 (see Figure 1, A and F, and Table 1). Phenotype abbreviations are the same as described in Table 2. All indicated colonies were also Leu⁻.