TABLE 1.
Comparison of simulation data plotted in Figure 3 with analytical results
| β | N | U | s | n0 |
 (2 SE) |
 |
 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.121 | 7,500 | 0.02 | 0.004 | 50.5 | 453 (34) | 230 | 207 |
| 15,000 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 101.1 | 906 (69) | 460 | 416 | |
| 30,000 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 202.1 | 1,805 (111) | 920 | 831 | |
| 0.242 | 3,000 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 20.2 | 141 (7) | 86 | 69 |
| 6,000 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 40.4 | 271 (23) | 172 | 138 | |
| 12,000 | 0.025 | 0.005 | 80.8 | 559 (39) | 344 | 276 | |
| 1.212 | 15,000 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 101.1 | 506 (41) | 479 | 451 |
| 30,000 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 202.2 | 1,008 (101) | 959 | 902 | |
| 60,000 | 0.025 | 0.005 | 404.2 | 1,950 (133) | 1,918 | 1,804 | |
| 2.424 | 30,000 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 202.1 | 1,490 (149) | 1,487 | 1,071 |
| 45,000 | 0.067 | 0.013 | 303.2 | 2,104 (218) | 2,230 | 1,608 | |
| 60,000 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 404.2 | 2,579 (257) | 2,974 | 2,143 |
The interclick time 
is obtained in simulations, 
by numerically evaluating the integrals in (28) for α = 1, and 
by using the scaling form (34).