Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 15;105(34):12242–12247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805858105

Table 1.

Percent wild-type sequence identity before and after force field optimization

Computed sequences Percent sequence identity*
Total Core Boundary Surface
Gβ1, initial force field
    sbias0.0 16 20 8 17
    sbias2.0 55 70 33 59
    sbias4.0 84 80 67 93
    sbias5.0 92 90 92 93
    sbias6.0 100 100 100 100
Gβ1, tuned force field
    sbias0.0 53 100 50 38
    sbias0.5 76 100 50 86
    sbias1.0 92 100 83 97
    sbias1.5 96 100 92 97
    sbias2.0 100 100 100 100
ENH, initial force field
    sbias0.0 22 20 9 28
    sbias2.0 46 30 27 59
    sbias4.0 66 60 55 72
    sbias6.0 96 90 91 100
    sbias8.0 96 90 91 100
    sbias9.0 100 100 100 100
ENH, tuned force field
    sbias0.0 42 80 45 28
    sbias0.5 64 80 55 62
    sbias1.0 86 90 82 86
    sbias1.5 90 90 91 90
    sbias2.0 94 90 100 93
    sbias2.5 100 100 100 100

*Wild-type sequence identity was determined by using only the positions in the design. Values are rounded to the nearest integer. Wild-type sequence identities for random fixed composition sequences for Gβ1 were calculated to be 11%, 8%, 11%, and 12% for total, core, boundary, and surface positions, respectively.