Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 18;95(5):2583–2598. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.118620

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

“Thread-grain” transition of mitochondria: swelling versus fission. (A and B) Model mitochondria shortening from l = 2.5 μm and d = 0.34 μm due to swelling (A) or fission (B). (C and D) Diameters of model mitochondria calculated as a function of length, based on the considerations of constant n and stotal for swelling (C) and constant vtotal and stotal for fission (D). (E) vtotal as a function of length during swelling. (F) Number of mitochondria as a function of length during fission (the starting n was 100). (G and H) Thinness ratios obtained by filtering blurred model mitochondrion images generated with the parameters given in CF using filter functions shown in Fig. 2 D. Traces from top to bottom in CE, and from bottom to top in FH correspond to the starting diameters (in μm) 0.44, 0.40, 0.36, 0.32, 0.30, 0.28, 0.26, and 0.22, or to stotal/vtotal ratios (constant for fission and initial for swelling from l = 7.5 μm) of (in μm−1) 9, 10, 11, 12.3, 13, 14, 16, and 19. The simulation of mitochondrial swelling was started from l = 7.5 μm (black traces) and alternatively from l = 2.5 μm (gray traces) with the same starting diameters as given above. The results of the fission simulation are fully determined by the constant stotal and vtotal, and therefore do not depend on the initial length.