Skip to main content
. 2008 May 8;34(9):1638–1645. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1124-6

Table 1.

Patients’ demographic, clinical, and biochemical data

PMX CONV
Age (years) 61 ± 10 59 ± 13
Male N (%) 6 (75) 6 (75)
APACHE II 21.2 ± 3.6 20.4 ± 4.4
Site of infection N (%)
 Abdominal 7 (87) 5(65)
 Urinary tract 1 (13) 3(35)
Antibiotics N (%)
 Glycopeptides 4 (50) 5 (62)
 Aminoglycosides 3 (37) 4 (50)
SOFA score
 T0 11 (13–7) 9 (20–7)
 T72 5.5 (11–2)a 10.5 (23–6)d
RIFLE N (%)
 Risk
  T0 5 (62.5) 5 (62.5)
  T72 2 (25) 2 (25)
 Injury
  T0 2 (25) 1 (12.5)
  T72 0 1 (12.5)
 Failure
  T0 0 0
  T72 0 1(12.5)
 Risk + injury + failure
  T0 7 (87) 6 (75)
  T72 2 (25)b 4 (50)
Patients on catecholamine N (%)
 T0 8 (100) 8(100)
 T72 3 (37)c 7 (87)
Noradrenaline (μg/kg/min)
 T0 0.5 (1.0–0.1) 0.45 (0.8–0.08)
 T72 0 (0.4–0)a 0.12 (0.8–0)
LPS (pg/ml)
 T0 187.83 ± 21.45 162.57 ± 37.87
 T72 87.74 ± 19.45a 184.63 ± 30.56
TNF-alpha (pg/ml)
 T0 84.53 ± 19.85 76.53 ± 16.32
 T72 21.34 ± 7.98a 95.34 ± 19.64

Data are expressed as mean ± SD and median (range)

PMX polymyxin-B, CONV conventional, APACHE II acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment, RIFLE risk, injury, failure, loss of function, end stage

aWilcoxon Signed Rank test PMX: T0 versus T72, P = 0.02

bFisher Exact test PMX: T0 versus T72, P = 0.04

cFisher Exact test: PMX versus CONV at T72, P = 0.02

dMann–Whitney test: PMX T72 versus CONV T72, P = 0.02