Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2008 May 19;43(2):115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.02.003

Table 2.

Comparison of Androgen Levels, Glucose, and Glucose: Insulin Ratios Among the Four Groups

Normal Abnormal physical exam Abnormal Cycles Abnormal physical exam& abnormal cycles
Group I (N=42*) Group II (N=41*) Group III (N=15*) Group IV (N=22*) P value (ANOVA)
T, mean, ng/dL (SD) 65.6 (43.5) 62.0 (28.4) 77.6 (70.4) 99.3(71.2) <0.051,**
SHBG, mean, ug/dL (SD) 1.8 (0.7) 1.5 (0.8) 1.5 (0.8) 0.8 (0.3) <0.012,***
FAI, mean (SD) 4.3 (4.0) 5.8 (5.0) 6.2 (5.3) 17.3 (24.7) <0.013,**
Δ 4 A, mean, ng/dL (SD) 294.0 (124.0) 311.6 (114.1) 343.7 (177.4) 446.5 (187.1) <0.014, **
LH, mean, IU/L (SD) 6.2 (8.2) 4.8 (3.0) 9.3 (6.4) 9.2 (4.8) <0.015, **
LH:FSH ratio (SD) 1.2 (1.0) 1.1 (1.1) 2.8 (4.8) 1.9 (1.1) <0.016, **
Fasting glucose, median (range) (mg/dL) 84.0 (55–99) 84.0(55–101) 85.0(58–91) 83.5 (70–101) 0.979
GIR, median (range) 6.6 (2.4–21) 4.7 (1.4–17.8) 5.4 (3.8–22.8) 3.9 (1.2–21.5) <0.017,***

SD – standard deviation GIR – Glucose: Insulin Ratio

*

for SHBG, Δ4A, LH, and FSH, Ns are 41, 41, 15, and 21 for GI, GII, GIII, and GIV, respectively, as the androgen levels in 2 samples were not done; for T and FAI, N is 36, 36, 14, and 19 for GI, GII, GIII, and GIV, respectively, as testosterone levels in 15 samples were not done; for glucose and insulin levels all 120 subjects were tested.

**

p<0.05 for significantly positive trend from group I to IV by Kendall’s Tau_b and Spearman’s rho.

***

p<0.01 for significantly negative trend from group I to IV by Kendall’s Tau_b and Spearman’s rho.

1

Post-hoc Scheffe (group II vs. IV, p=0.08):

2

Post-hoc Scheffe (group I vs. IV, p<0.01, group II vs. IV, p<0.01, group III vs IV, p<0.05)

3

Post-hoc Scheffe (group I vs. IV, II vs IV, III vs IV, p<0.01)

4

Post-hoc Scheffe (group I vs. IV, p<0.01, group II vs. IV, p<0.01)

5

Post-hoc Scheffe (group II vs. IV, p<0.06)

6

Post-hoc Scheffe (group II vs. III, p=0.04)

7

Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney (group I vs II, I vs IV, III vs IV, p<0.01)