Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug;43(4):1204–1222. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00834.x

Table 1.

Baseline Costs ($), QALYs, Client Characteristics, and Utilization: Before and after Matching*

FFS versus DC FFS versus MBHO


FFS DC p-value FFS MBHO p-value
Mean costs
 Before matching 4,820 4,524 .11 4,820 6,822 .02
 After matching 4,820 4,805 .32 4,820 4,580 .42
Mean QALYs
 Before matching 0.475 0.485 .10 0.475 0.482 .29
 After matching 0.475 0.476 .78 0.474 0.474 .33
% Schizophrenia
 Before matching 72.2 61.9 .05 72.2 65.1 .16
 After matching 72.2 70.8 .68 72.2 72.2 1.00
% Bipolar
 Before matching 21.2 30.7 .05 21.2 25.6 .33
 After matching 21.2 22.5 .48 21.2 21.9 .56
Mean age
 Before matching 43.4 42.3 .58 43.4 45.1 .32
 After matching 43.4 43.4 .84 43.4 43.7 .86
% Men
 Before matching 44.3 47.7 .54 44.3 49.7 .32
 After matching 44.3 43.7 .78 44.3 45.0 .70
% Previous high cost client
 Before matching 37.1 36.4 .89 37.1 31.8 .31
 After matching 37.1 37.1 1.00 37.1 36.4 .32
% Using any service
 Before matching 89.4 93.8 0.16 89.4 90.3 .80
 After matching 89.4 89.4 1.00 89.4 89.4 1.00
*

Before matching: n =522, FFS (n =151), DC (n =176), MBHO (n =195); after matching: n =453 (n =151 in each group).

The tests conducted are nonparametric bootstrap Kolomogorov–Smirnov distributional tests.

Note that QALY data were not available for eight cases before, and four cases after matching.

FFS, fee for service; DC, direct capitation; MBHO, managed behavioral health organization; QALY, quality-adjusted life year.