Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 18.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Jun 28;23(5):653–661. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.05.006

Table 2.

Mid foot force and pressure variables for DM+PN involved feet

Calcaneal BMD (mg/cm2) Medial column phenotype (n = 15)
Lateral column phenotype (n = 11)
Mean 99% CI (LL) 99% CI (UL) Mean 99% CI (LL) 99% CI (UL) P-value
365 274 456 461 359 563 0.02
Medial mid foot mask
Lateral mid foot mask
Medial mid foot mask
Lateral mid foot mask
Mean 99%CI (LL) 99% CI (UL) Mean 99% CI (LL) 99% CI (UL) P-value Mean 99% CI (LL) 99% CI (UL) Mean 99% CI (LL) 99% CI (UL) P-value
Maximum
Vertical force (N) 280 186 374 462 337 587 0.00a 79 0 170 414 270 558 0.00a,b,c
Force time integral (N s) 131 52 210 231 158 304 0.00a 29 0 63 203 116 290 0.00a,b,c
Peak pressure (N/cm2) 74 46 101 84 57 112 NSa 12 0 26 59 33 85 0.00a,b,c,d
Pressure time integral [(N/cm2) s] 34 17 52 42 25 60 NSa 6 0 13 28 12 43 0.00a,b,c
Contact area (cm2) 23 16 30 31 26 36 NSa 11 1 21 30 23 37 0.00a,b,c
Contact time (ms) 875 651 1099 928 688 1168 NSa 484 246 721 787 624 951 0.00a,b,c

Mean and 99% confidence interval lower limit [CI (LL)] – confidence interval upper limit [CI (UL)]. n Represents the number of feet involved. P-value is Bonferroni corrected pairwise probability after significant t test for independent samples.

a

Medial mid foot mask vs lateral mid foot mask within a phenotype.

b

medial mid foot mask vs medial mid foot mask between phenotypes.

c

medial mid foot mask vs lateral mid foot mask between phenotypes.

d

lateral mid foot mask vs lateral mid foot mask between phenotypes.