Table 4.
Age | Model of SE | Drug | Dose mg/kg | Mortality of DZP or PTB with SE | Mortality DZP or PTB without SE | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P9 | KA | DZP | 30 | 33% | 0% | 0.5 |
PTB | 40 | 0% | 10% | 1.0 | ||
Li-Pilo | DZP | 30 | 100% | 0% | 0.01 * | |
PTB | 40 | 100% | 10% | 0.00087 * | ||
P15 | KA | DZP | 20 | 0% | 0% | - |
PTB | 50 | 23% | 23% | - | ||
Li-Pilo | DZP | 20 | 10% | 0% | 0.45 | |
PTB | 50 | 100% | 23% | 0.0001 * | ||
P21 | KA | DZP | 20 | 0% | 0% | - |
PTB | 50 | 0% | 11% | 0.45 | ||
Li-Pilo | DZP | 20 | 0% | 0% | - | |
PTB | 50 | 82% | 11% | 0.006 * |
At P9: In the KA model the mortality following the treatment was not different from rats without SE that were treated with DZP or PTB. In the Li-Pilo model, both treated groups had a significantly higher mortality than the groups without SE. At P15 and P21: In the KA model there was no difference in mortality between the two groups. In the Li-Pilo model rats that received PTB following SE had a significantly higher mortality than the rats that were given PTB but not exposed to Li-Pilo. There was no difference in the rats receiving DZP.