Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 10;23(7):991–997. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0667-0

Table 2.

Change in Mean Frequency of Accurate Observations for Intervention and Control Groups

Paired Pre- and Post-course Images Intervention (n = 24) Control (n = 34) Difference Between Intervention and Control (SD)
Mean Δ Score* (SD) P-value Mean Δ Score* (SD) P-value Mean Δ Score (SD) P-value
1 5.87 (0.89) <.001 0.75 (0.73) 0.31 5.12 (1.16) <.001
2 4.99 (0.99) <.001 1.30 (0.81) 0.11 3.68 (1.29) 0.006
3 2.48 (0.81) <.001 −0.61 (0.67) 0.36 3.09 (1.05) 0.005
4 4.72 (1.12) <.001 −0.74 (1.0) 0.46 5.46 (1.57) 0.001
5 8.89 (1.44) <.001 0.73 (1.19) 0.54 8.15 (1.86) <.001
TOTAL 5.41 (0.63) <.001 0.36 (0.53) 0.49 5.05 (0.82) <.001

*Post-course frequency of accurate observations minus pre-course frequency

†P-values based on paired t-tests from generalized estimating equations

‡Total score were calculated by adding mean umber of accurate observations for each image then dividing by five