Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cognition. 2008 Mar 20;108(1):69–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.01.001

Table 6.

Experiment 1 statistical data for analyses across all four conditions. Nonsignificant and marginal effects are shaded.

Main effect of accenting Main effect of anaphoricity Interaction (anaphoricity × accenting)
Proportion of first looks after target expression onset to the target onset Odds ratio = 0.45
S.E. =.36
t = 1.26
DF = 347
p =.21		 Odds ratio = 1.15
S.E. =.34
t = 3.36
DF = 347
p <.001		 Odds ratio = -1.05
S.E. =.47
t = -2.22
DF = 347
p <.05
Proportion looks to target object (300–1000 after target onset) + * F1 (1,35) = 6.05
p <.05		 F1(1,35) = 1.27
p =.127		 F1(1,35) = 8.08, p <.01
F2(1,20) = 2.18
p =.156		 F2 (1,20) = 4.19
p =.054		 F2 (1,20) = 15.74
p =.001
Proportion looks to competitor object (300–1000 after target onset) + F1 (1,35) = 1.86
p =.181		 F1(1,35) = 2.80
p =.103		 F1 (1,35) = 6.07
p <.05
F2 (1,20) = 1.05
p =.319		 F2 (1,20) = 5.07
p <.05		 F2 (1,20) = 6.19,
p <.05
*

There was also a three-way interaction itemgroup x accent x anaphoricity in the F2 analysis

+

One cell was missing in the F1 analysis and was replaced by the participant mean.