Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem A. 2007 May 3;111(26):5685–5691. doi: 10.1021/jp070308d

Table II.

Comparison of the HF/6-31G(d,p) binding energies between the lowest-energy conformations identified with SCCDFTB method and HF/6-31G(d,p) method for (H2O)N, N=10, 11, 13, 14, and 18. The energies are in kcal/mol.

N ΔEbind(SCCDFTB)a ΔEbind(HF)b
10 −93.97 −96.75
11 −105.89 −105.69
13 −130.33 −128.33
14 −141.05 −144.78
18 −187.59 −188.64
a

The energies were computed by re-minimizing the lowest-SCCDFTB-energy structures with the HF/6-31G(d,p) method.

b

The original lowest binding energies reported in ref 31.