Skip to main content
. 2008 May 15;105(2):700–710. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00170.2007

Table 2.

Contribution of PD II classifiers to performance on the EMG signal database

Contraction No. MAP Algorithm Accuracy INT Algorithm Accuracy SUP Algorithm Accuracy
1 45.6% 52.9% 75.6%
2 61.7% 69.5% 90.1%
3 75.3% 75.9% 96.6%
4 74.1% 75.2% 88.3%
5 60.1% 71.5% 77.6%
6 61.4% 63.9% 88.0%
Average 63.0% 68.2% 86.0%

MAP, maximum a posteriori probability; INT, integration; SUP, superposition.