Skip to main content
. 2008 May 27;34(3):243–255. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90207.2008

Table 7.

Statistical significance and strain ranking consistency for selected variables in the tests performed

Test Measure Strain Center Strain × Center Strain Ranking Consistency (# of Centers)
Open field distance traveled P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P=0.0012 C57>C3H, BALB>129 (4/4)
Open field % time in center P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 C57>C3H>BALB>129 (4/4)
SHIRPA crossings P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 C57>C3H, BALB>129 (4/5)
Grip strength 2-paw force P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P=0.0025 C57<129<C3H (5/5)
Grip strength 4-paw force P<0.0001 P=0.039 P=0.229 C57<129<C3H (3/4)
Rotarod 1st validation latency to fall P=0.0003 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 not consistent
Rotarod 2nd validation latency to fall P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P=0.0143 C57>C3H>129 (3/3)
Y-maze %SAP P=0.0006 P=0.962 P=0.1114 129<C57, C3H, BALB (3/3)
Y-maze tot entries P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P=0.0003 129<C57, C3H, BALB (3/3)
ASR-PPI startle response P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 C57<C3H, BALB, 129 (4/4)
ASR-PPI % PPI P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P=0.0037 C57, BALB<C3H<129 (4/4)
Tail flick latency P=0.0014 P<0.0001 P=0.0006 C3H>C57>129 (2/3)

The table illustrates the level of significance of main effects (strain or center) and 2-way interaction (strain × center) from factorial ANOVA as well as providing a summary of the consistency of strain rankings across centers. SHIRPA, Smithkline Beecham-MRC Harwell-Imperial College-Royal London Hospital phenotype assessment; %SAP, percentage of spontaneous alternation performance.