Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 1;34(3):338–348. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90200.2008

Table 1.

Preferences of B6 and PWK mice for 12 taste compounds: results of ANOVAs

Compound
Strain
Concentration
Strain × Concentration
df F P df F P F P
CaCl2 1,17 284.28 0.0000 3,51 11.69 0.0000 37.91 0.0000
CaLa 1,17 206.84 0.0000 3,51 3.39 0.0249 24.92 0.0000
MgCl2 1,23 185.29 0.0000 6,132 21.40 0.0000 34.11 0.0000
Denatonium 1,23 1.79 0.1944 6,138 35.00 0.0000 0.76 0.6049
QHCl 1,23 0.00 0.9775 3,69 17.80 0.0000 0.94 0.4264
Caffeine 1,23 1.73 0.2011 4,92 25.98 0.0000 1.77 0.1419
HCl 1,22 0.51 0.4835 5,110 22.69 0.0000 1.28 0.2785
Citric acid 1,22 0.31 0.5813 5,110 17.70 0.0000 1.28 0.2764
Saccharin 1,23 1.44 0.2428 6,132 25.26 0.0000 3.28 0.0049
NaCl 1,17 0.22 0.6432 3,51 3.25 0.0292 1.82 0.1546
NaLa 1,17 1.87 0.1892 3,51 3.88 0.0142 2.00 0.1251
IMP 1,22 1.27 0.2728 8,176 29.25 0.0000 0.58 0.7912

Each row gives the output of a 2-way mixed-design ANOVA based on preferences of C57BL/6J (B6) and PWK/PhJ (PWK) mice (means and SE, and concentrations tested are given in Fig. 1). CaLa, calcium lactate; QHCl, quinine hydrochloride; NaLa, sodium lactate; IMP, inosine monophosphate. Degrees of freedom (df) for strain × concentration interaction are always the same as for the main effect of concentration.