Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1968 May;95(5):1779–1789. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.5.1779-1789.1968

Methylenetetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase of the Amethopterin-resistant Strain Streptococcus faecium var. durans Ak and Its Repressibility by Serine

Alberta M Albrecht 1, Franklin K Pearce 1, Dorris J Hutchison 1
PMCID: PMC252212  PMID: 4384970

Abstract

The methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase of the amethopterin-resistant strain Streptococcus faecium var. durans Ak was purified 100-fold. Because it is extremely labile, this enzyme required protection by 1 mm nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP+) during purification; 0.01 mm EADP+ with 0.1% bovine plasma albumin stabilized the purified enzyme during storage at −20 C. Although the enzyme has properties of sulfhydryl enzymes, thiol compounds were not stabilizers. Oxidation of methylenetetrahydrofolate, catalyzed by the purified enzyme preparation, is NADP+-specific and yields methenyltetrahydrofolate and the reduced pyridine nucleotide. Km values for NADP+ and for 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (prepared as the formaldehyde adduct of biologically synthesized l,l-tetrahydrofolate) were calculated to be 0.021 and 0.026 mm, respectively. Neither purine bases and their derivatives nor serine inhibited the reaction. In growing cultures, the differential rate of synthesis of the methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase was dependent upon the composition of the medium. A medium which contained acid-hydrolyzed casein, and thus an exogenous source of serine, was repressive for this enzyme. In a serine-free, completely defined medium, the amount of folate added (for serine synthesis de novo) affected the duration of the initial exponential growth phase. At the termination of this phase, which primarily reflected the onset of a decreased rate of serine biosynthesis, synthesis of the methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase was derepressed. Exogenous serine in the completely defined medium prevented the derepression. Furthermore, physiological concentrations of l-serine were repressive not only for the dehydrogenase but also for the methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase and the serine hydroxymethyl-transferase. Concomitantly, the differential rate of synthesis of the formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase of S. faecium var. durans Ak was increased. Apparently, serine regulates the differential rates of syntheses of these enzymes.

Full text

PDF
1779

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALBRECHT A. M., HUTCHISON D. J. REPRESSION BY ADENINE OF THE FORMYLTETRAHYDROFOLATE SYNTHETASE IN AN ANTIFOLIC-RESISTANT MUTANT OF STREPTOCOCCUS FAECALIS. J Bacteriol. 1964 Apr;87:792–798. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.4.792-798.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albrecht A. M., Palmer J. L., Hutchison D. J. Differentiating properties of the dihydrofolate reductases of amethopterin-resistant Streptococcus faecalis/Ak and the sensitive parent strain. J Biol Chem. 1966 Mar 10;241(5):1043–1048. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albrecht A. M., Pearce F. K., Hutchison D. J. Folate coenzymes in amethopterin-sensitive and -resistant strains of Streptococcus faecalis. Enzymatic formation and metabolic function. J Biol Chem. 1966 Mar 10;241(5):1036–1042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BLAKLEY R. L. Spectrophotometric studies on the combination of formaldehyde with tetrahydropteroylglutamic acid and other hydropteridines. Biochem J. 1960 Jan;74:71–82. doi: 10.1042/bj0740071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. COULTAS M. K., HUTCHISON D. J. Metabolism of resistant mutants of Streptococcus faecalis. IV. Use of a biophotometer in growth-curve studies. J Bacteriol. 1962 Sep;84:393–401. doi: 10.1128/jb.84.3.393-401.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coultas M. K., Albrecht A. M., Hutchison D. J. Strain variation within Streptococcus faecium var. durans. J Bacteriol. 1966 Aug;92(2):516–517. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.2.516-517.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dalal F. R., Gots J. S. Inhibition of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase by purine nucleotides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1966 Feb 3;22(3):340–345. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(66)90488-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dalal F. R., Gots J. S. Purification of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase from Salmonella typhimurium and its inhibition by purine nucleotides. J Biol Chem. 1967 Aug 25;242(16):3636–3640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dickerman H., Steers E., Jr, Redfield B. G., Weissbach H. Formylation of Escherichia coli methionyl-sRNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1966;31:287–288. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Donaldson K. O., Scott V. F., Scott W. Purification and properties of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1965 Nov;240(11):4444–4448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FRIEDKIN M. ENZYMATIC ASPECTS OF FOLIC ACID. Annu Rev Biochem. 1963;32:185–214. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.32.070163.001153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HATEFI Y., OSBORN M. J., KAY L. D., HUENNEKENS F. M. Hydroxymethyl tetrahydrofolic dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 1957 Aug;227(2):637–647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HUTCHISON D. J. Metabolism of resistant mutants of Streptococcus faecalis. I. Isolation and characterization of the mutants. Cancer Res. 1958 Feb;18(2):214–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. JOHNSON A. H., HUTCHISON D. J. FOLIC ACID METABOLISM IN ANTIFOLIC-RESISTANT MUTANTS OF STREPTOCOCCUS FAECALIS. J Bacteriol. 1964 Apr;87:786–791. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.4.786-791.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. KAUFMAN B. T., DONALDSON K. O., KERESZTESY J. C. Chromatographic separation of the diastereoisomers of dl, L-5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate. J Biol Chem. 1963 Apr;238:1498–1500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MATHEWS C. K., HUENNEKENS F. M. Enzymic preparation of the 1,L-diastereoisomer of tetrahydrofolic acid. J Biol Chem. 1960 Nov;235:3304–3308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MONOD J., PAPPENHEIMER A. M., Jr, COHEN-BAZIRE G. La cinétique de la biosynthèse de la beta-galactosidase chez E. coli considérée comme fonction de la croissance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1952 Dec;9(6):648–660. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(52)90227-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. OSBORN M. J., HUENNEKENS F. M. Participation of anhydroleucovorin in the hydroxymethyl tetrahydrofolic dehydrogenase system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1957 Dec;26(3):646–647. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(57)90117-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. RAMASASTRI B. V., BLAKLEY R. L. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolic dehydrogenase from bakers' yeast. I. Partial purification and some properties. J Biol Chem. 1962 Jun;237:1982–1988. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yeh Y. C., Greenberg D. M. Purification and properties of N5, N10-Methylenetetra-hydrofolate dehydrogenase of calf thymus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Aug 24;105(2):279–291. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6593(65)80152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES