Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 26.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2006 Oct 12;8(21):4911–4914. doi: 10.1021/ol062005s

Table 1.

Catalyst Screening and Reaction Condition Optimizationsagraphic file with name nihms-63822-t0007.jpg

entry catalyst solvent temp
(°C)
time
(h)
yield
(%)b
ee
(%)c
1 1 acetone rt 24
2 2 acetone rt 24 46 72
3 3 acetone rt 3 93 84
4 3 CH2Cl2 rt 10 76 84
5 3 DMSO rt 10 45 79
6 3 DMF rt 10 55 60
7 3 acetone 0 10 95 92
8d 3 acetone 0 24 95 94
9d 3 acetone -20 24 62 94
10 ent-3 acetone 0 24 91 92e
a

Unless otherwise indicated, all reactions were performed with freshly prepared diethyl formylphosphonate hydrate (4, 0.5 mmol), acetone (0.2 mL), solvent (0.4 mL) and catalyst (10 mol %) at 0 ° C.

b

Yield of isolated product after column chromatography.

c

The enantiomeric excess was determined by chiral GC analysis with a Chiraldex GTA column.

d

With 5 mol % of catalyst loading.

e

(R)-6a was obtained as the major enantiomer.