Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 14;17(Suppl 2):236–238. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0498-4

Table 1.

Summary of data of all nine cases

Motor evoked potential amplitude
Case Age Sex R stim L stim R stim L stim Anesthesia Wake up test Outcome
I UL C UL I UL C UL I LL C LL I LL C LL
1 12 F NC NC TIVA Abnormal N after I
2 15 F NC NC TIVA Abnormal N after I
3 15 F NC NC NC NC TIVA Abnormal N after I
4 14 F NC NC NC NC NC NC NC TIVA N N
5 14 F NC NC NC NC NC NC Sevoflurane N N
6 19 F NC NC NC NC NC NC NC TIVA N N
7 14 F NC NC NC NC NC NC NC TIVA N N
8 15 F NC NC NC NC NC NC TIVA N N
9 19 F NC NC NC NC NC NC TIVA N N

F female, R right, L left, I ipsilateral, C contralateral, UL upper limb, LL lower limb, Stim cortical stimulation, TIVA total intravenous anesthesia, NC no change; ↓ reduced, N normal, I implant correction