Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2006 Nov 13;45(23):9197–9205. doi: 10.1021/ic061554r

Table 1.

Crystal data and structure refinement for [HIPTN3N]V(THF) and [HIPTN3N]V(NH3).

[HIPTN3N]V(THF) [HIPTN3N]V(NH3)
Empirical formula C132H199N4OV C121H178N5V
Formula weight 1908.89 1753.62
Temperature 100(2) K 193(2) K
Crystal system Triclinic Monoclinic
Space group P1̄ Cc
Unit cell dimensions a = 17.7727(6) Å a = 16.1153(4) Å
b = 18.3700(7) Å b = 39.7548(11) Å
c = 21.2032(9) Å c = 18.0197(5) Å
a= 113.9930(10)° a = 90°
b= 99.8920(10)° b = 93.0540(10)°
g = 96.5660(10)° g = 90°
Volume 6098.5(4) Å3 11528.1(5) Å3
Z 2 4
Density (calculated) 1.040 Mg/m3 1.010 Mg/m3
Absorption coefficient 0.130 mm−1 0.132 mm−1
F(000) 2100 3848
Crystal size 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.08 mm3 0.20 × 0.17 × 0.10 mm3
Theta range for data collection 1.40 to 28.28° 1.99 to 25.03°
Index ranges −23<=h<=23 −18<=h<=19
−24<=k<=24 −47<=k<=41
−28<=l<=27 −21<=l<=13
Reflections collected 127420 29563
Independent reflections 30238 [R(int) = 0.0638] 15469 [R(int) = 0.0305]
Completeness to theta = (x°) 99.9 % (28.28) 99.9 % (25.03)
Max. and min. transmission 0.9897 and 0.9745 0.9869 and 0.9741
Data/restraints/parameters 30238/397/1243 15469/3023/1536
Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.043 1.015
Final R indices [I>2sigma(I)] R1 = 0.0696, wR2 = 0.1764 R1 = 0.0584, wR2 = 0.1452
R indices (all data) R1 = 0.1069, wR2 = 0.2005 R1 = 0.0766, wR2 = 0.1585
Largest diff. peak and hole 0.896 and −0.562 e.Å−3 0.317 and −0.268 e.Å−3
a

In all cases the wavelength was 0.71073 Å, the absorption correction was semi-empirical from equivalents, and the refinement method was full-matrix least-squares on F2.