Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep;66(3):352–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03257.x

Table 2.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic structural model parameter estimates for the effect of nicorandil on PAWP using model 10. Bootstrap coefficient of variation (standard deviation/median) and empirical 90% confidence interval

Statistic Description Median Units CV % Confidence interval
5% 95%
POP_S0 Baseline PAWP 25.6 mmHg 2.7 24.6 26.8
POP_Sss Steady state PAWP 19.5 mmHg 10.0 16.5 22.7
POP_TPROG Progress half-life 5.83 h 69.4 0.920 11.9
POP_Emax Maximum effect of nicorandil on PAWP −11.7 mmHg 58.7 −30.0 −7.48
POP_EC50 Nicorandil concentration at 50% of Emax 423 µg l−1 107.1 165 1552
POP_CL Nicorandil clearance 26.3 l h−1 70 kg−1 13.5 21.9 31.5
POP_V1 Central volume of distribution 18.1 l 70 kg−1 14.8 14.9 23.3
POP_Q Intercompartmental clearance 71.6 l h−1 70 kg−1 76.9 54.5 203
POP_V2 Peripheral volume of distribution 24.1 l 70 kg−1 6.6 21.1 25.4
FCL Fractional CL change in heart failure 1.94 25.0 1.03 2.63
FV1 Fractional V1 change in heart failure 1.39 17.0 1.05 1.81
FQ Fractional Q change in heart failure 0.519 42.8 0.192 0.891
FV2 Fractional V2 change in heart failure 4.06 219.1 1.83 25.3