Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 29;283(35):23645–23655. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801686200

TABLE 4.

Comparison of steady-state kinetic parameters for one-base incorporation opposite N2-EtG and N2,N2-diMeG by human REV1

Template: dNTP Km kcat kcat/Km -Fold difference of kcat/Km compared with N2-EtG f (misinsertion ratio)
μm s-1 mm-1 s-1 -fold
N2-EtG: dCTP 9.4 ± 1.8 0.0046 ± 0.0002 0.49 1
N2,N2-diMeG: dCTP 10 ± 2 0.0080 ± 0.0003 0.80 1.6-fold higher 1
N2-EtG: dGTP 290 ± 90 0.0014 ± 0.0001 0.0048 0.010
N2,N2-diMeG: dGTP 190 ± 50 0.0030 ± 0.0002 0.016 3-fold higher 0.046
N2-EtG: dTTP 400 ± 60 0.0019 ± 0.0001 0.0048 0.010
N2,N2-diMeG: dTTP 140 ± 40 0.0039 ± 0.0003 0.028 6-fold higher 0.080