Table 4.
Criteria list used to assess the quality of the intensive group training protocol
| 1 | At least two or more criteria have been set (focussed on activities or participation) |
| 2 | Duration, intensity, frequency etc. were formulated in the treatment goals |
| 3 | Reducing pain was not adopted as a treatment goal |
| 4 | The treatment goals were evaluated (whether goals are met is registered) |
| 5 | A minimum of two baseline measurements were performed |
| 6 | A treatment agreement (with goals) was signed by patient and physiotherapist |
| 7 | Information on dealing with (chronic) pain was provided |
| 8 | A minimum of 15 group training sessions (75%) were attended |
| 9 | Patient trained in a group |
| 10 | Graphs were used during training sessions and evaluations |
| 11 | A gradually progressive exercise scheme was prepared |
| 12 | There was/were plausible reason(s) for not following the progressive exercise scheme |
| 13 | At least one aerobic exercise was included in the scheme |
| 14 | At least one back exercise was included in the scheme |
| 15 | At least one abdominal exercise was included in the scheme |
| 16 | At least one buttock exercise was included in the scheme |
| 17 | A minimum of two evaluations were performed |
| 18 | No other (manual) therapies for low back pain were performed |
One point was assigned to each positively assessed Item; the maximum score was 18. For adoption in the per protocol analysis a minimum of 14 points were necessary