Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2007 Jun;21(2):216–225. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.2.216

Table 6.

Fit Indices for Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Model 3 Using Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale Change Scores

Data χ2 df p GFI NNFI CFI SRMR RMSEA
Baseline to Week 2
 MF 30.16 20 .07 .95 .97 .98 .04 .07
Baseline to Week 1
 NXP 53.78 20 <.05 .95 .92 .94 .05 .09
Week 1 to Week 2
 NXP 48.57 20 <.05 .95 .88 .91 .06 .09
Week 2 to Week 4
 MF 41.89 20 <.05 .91 .82 .87 .07 .10
 NXP 50.46 20 <.05 .94 .85 .89 .06 .09
Week 4 to Week 6
 MF 38.97 20 <.05 .91 .81 .87 .07 .10
 NXP 50.61 20 <.05 .94 .83 .88 .07 .09

Note. GFI = goodness-of-fit index; NNFI = nonnormed fit index; CFI = comparative fit index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; MF = message framing study (baseline to Week 2 n = 120; Week 2 to Week 4 n = 102; Week 4 to Week 6 n = 95); NXP = naltrexone + patch study (baseline to Week 1 n = 220; Week 1 to Week 2 n = 197; Week 2 to Week 4 n = 185; Week 4 to Week 6 n = 178). Model 3, unitary factor = craving, irritability, anxiety, difficulty concentrating, restlessness, increased appetite or weight gain, depression, and insomnia.