Skip to main content
. 2008 Jun 9;155(1):17–23. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.234

Table 1.

Curve fitting of data points displayed on Figure 3

Model dfa SSEb Parameter estimates
A. Two-state dimer model 18 0.1287 KD1=10−7.6; KD2=10−4.9
Inline graphic      
B. Empirically used two-state dimer and two independent sites models 18 0.1287 c1=10−4.9; c2=10−12.4
Inline graphic      
C. Two independent sites model with f fixed to ½ 18 0.1287 KD1=10−7.6; KD2=10−4.9
Inline graphic      
D. Two independent sites model* 17 0.0544 KD1=10−8.1; KD2=10−5.1; f=0.33
Inline graphic      
E. Two independent sites model with the empirical inclusion of Hill coefficients* # 15 0.0186 KD1=10−8.0; KD2=10−5.1; f=0.38; nH1=1.16; nH2=2.25
Inline graphic      

Parameter estimates of a set of models, and statistical comparisons of resulting fittings.

Comparisons between models by the extra-sum of squares F-test (Motulsky and Christopoulos, 2004): *P<0.05 with either of Models A, B or C; #P<0.05 with Model D.

a

Degrees of freedom.

b

Sum of squares of the error.