Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 10;3(9):e3141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003141

Figure 4. The effect of flight behavior of predatory hornets on the waving strength of Giant honeybees (scenario B).

Figure 4

The waving strength W600 gives the numbers of bees which had shaken their abdomens over 15 frames (definition see inset and text); it depends on the hornet's distance from the nest dxz (A) and on the hornet's flight velocity vxz (B); time zero in the insets defines the start of the shimmering waves (cf. Fig. 3); (A,C) red to yellow shaded areas define the five dxz classes, and (B,D) green to blue shaded areas define the eight vxz classes of hornet flights as used in Fig. 3 (for definition see Methods); open circles are arithmetical means, thin vertical and horizontal lines denote SEM; thick lines are regressions of the mean values regarding to 201 wave episodes with 317 flight episodes of two wasps (Cdxz = 1 to 5; Cvxz = 1 to 8); regression A: r = −0.969, P = 0.006; regression B: r = −0.963, P = 0.015. W−400, the amplitude of the waving strength 400 ms before the onset of the consecutive wave (see inset and text for definition), giving the residual shimmering strength under repetitive conditions; W−400 declines with dxz (regression C: r = −0.989; P = 0.022), but inclines regarding vxz at lower velocity levels (Cvxz = 1–5: regression d1: r = 0.975, P = 0.005) and shows an overall nonlinear relation for Cvxz = 1–8 (regression d2: r = 0.857; P = 0.027). All tests refer to Polynomial Regression (SigmaStat).