Table 3B.
Linking Variables | Pattern |
Probability Among Matches (M) |
Ratio Naïve/ Nonn ∗ | Ratio Nonn/ Truth | Probability Among Nonmatches (U) |
Ratio Naïve/ Nonn | Ratio Nonn/ Truth | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
var1 | var2 | Naïve | Nonnaïve | Truth | Naïve | Nonnaïve | Truth | |||||
Scenario 2: empirical data | ||||||||||||
Set of dependent variables | ||||||||||||
Date of birth of child (var1) | + | + | 0.8411 | 0.8753 | NA | 0.96 | NA | 0.000007 | 0.000073 | NA | 0.10 | NA |
Expected date of birth of child (var2) | + | − | 0.1090 | 0.0958 | 1.14 | 0.002693 | 0.002700 | 1.00 | ||||
− | + | 0.0442 | 0.0242 | 1.83 | 0.002573 | 0.002570 | 1.00 | |||||
− | − | 0.0057 | 0.0047 | 1.22 | 0.994727 | 0.994657 | 1.00 | |||||
Other variables in model | ||||||||||||
Date of birth of mother | + | 0.0568 | 0.9892 | 0.06 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.99 | |||||
Zip code of mother | + | 0.0580 | 0.9623 | 0.06 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 1.00 | |||||
Gender of child | + | 0.5327 | 0.9928 | 0.54 | 0.5007 | 0.5007 | 1.00 | |||||
Scenario 3: simulated data | ||||||||||||
Set of dependent variables | ||||||||||||
Date of birth of child (var1) | + | + | 0.8312 | 0.8753 | 0.8751 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.000007 | 0.000062 | 0.000062 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
Expected date of birth of child (var2) | + | − | 0.1149 | 0.0969 | 0.0969 | 1.19 | 1.00 | 0.002732 | 0.002739 | 0.002739 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
− | + | 0.0474 | 0.0252 | 0.0251 | 1.88 | 1.00 | 0.002539 | 0.002541 | 0.002541 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
− | − | 0.0066 | 0.0027 | 0.0028 | 2.46 | 0.94 | 0.994722 | 0.994657 | 0.994657 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Other variables in model | ||||||||||||
Date of birth of mother | + | 0.0667 | 0.9872 | 0.9870 | 0.07 | 1.00 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Zip code of mother | + | 0.0689 | 0.9610 | 0.9610 | 0.07 | 1.00 | 0.0007 | 0.0007 | 0.0007 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Gender of child | + | 0.5395 | 0.9920 | 0.9920 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.4989 | 0.4989 | 0.4989 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
∗ nonn = nonnaïve.
NA = not applicable.