Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):687–700. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2531

Table 1.

Table 1 An Overview of the Criteria for the Primary Component Execution

Criteria
Submitting proposals
  • 1 Proposals for changes in the TS are standardized in written forms, containing information on:

  • Proposer ID, i.e., identification of the person who suggests a change,

  • Version number, i.e., the unique version number of the TS for which the change is requested,

  • Concept information, i.e., concept ID, concept code and concept name,

  • Change type, i.e., change operation as described in the change model,

  • Change definition, i.e., description of the desired change.

Validating the proposals and verifying the changes
  • 2 Proposals for changes in the TS are validated, on:

  • Necessity, i.e., change is relevant for the domain of TS and does not lead to duplicate information,

  • Possibility to incorporate a change, i.e., change is consistent with scientific knowledge, doest not lead to redundancies and does not violate the TS structure.

  • 3 In case of uncertainty, the acceptance of proposals is based on group consensus.

  • 4 In case a proposal is rejected, feedback is given to the proposer.

  • 5 In case a proposal is accepted, changes made in the TS are verified by the maintenance team, on:

  • Completeness, i.e., all aspects of the change are taken into consideration,

  • Textual correctness, i.e., textual errors are corrected,

  • Consistency of hierarchic relations. the change does not lead to inconsistencies in the relations,

  • Consistency of mappings to other TSs, i.e., the change does not lead to inconsistencies in the mappings to other TSs,

  • Consistency of mappings to other languages, i.e., the change does not lead to inconsistencies in the mappings to other languages.

  • 6 After incorporation of the changes into the TS, feedback is given to the proposer, to:

  • Inform the proposer, i.e., notify that the suggested change is implemented,

  • Ask them to verify the changes, i.e., validate whether the adopted change is in compliance with the suggestion.

Documentation
  • 7 Documentation is structured and standardized.

  • 8 Proposals for changes are documented, with:

  • Proposal Date, i.e., the date on which the suggestion for a change was received,

  • Proposer ID, i.e., information on the proposer like name, address etc.,

  • Concept information, i.e., Concept ID, Concept code and Concept name,

  • Change type, i.e., suggested change operation based on the change model,

  • Acceptance method .e.g. whether consensus rounds were used,

  • Status, i.e., is the suggestion accepted or rejected,

  • Acceptation/rejection date, i.e., the date on which it was decided to accept or reject the change.

  • 9 Changes made in the TS are documented, with:

  • Concept information, i.e., concept ID, concept code and concept name,

  • Implementation date, i.e., the date on which the change is incorporated in the system,

  • Change type, i.e., change operation that was performed,

  • Editor ID, i.e., identification of the person who processed the change,

  • Version ID, i.e., version number of the TS in which the change was adopted.

Version management
  • 10 New versions of the TS have a unique identification number, including the publication date and are distributed as:

  • Complete new version, i.e., the whole knowledge of the TS is provided,

  • Incremental update, i.e., list with changes that can be imported into the previous version.

  • 11 On average, twice a year a new release of the system is launched (depending on the type of TS).

TS = terminological system.