Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 24;36(15):4833–4844. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn470

Table 1.

Input and output statistics of trans-SAs in 10 species

Species GoldenPath genome version Number of orientation-reliable sequences mapped to exact genomic location from NATsDB Total number of TUs Number of trans-SA TU pairs Number of TUs involved in trans-SAsb Proportion of TUs involved in trans-SAs among all TUs (%)
Human hg18 4 494 665 99 919 3327 2896 2.89
Mouse mm8 2 100 305 57 416 1519 1799 3.13
Fly dm2 310 319 15 375 76 122 0.79
Worm ce2 291 395 19 815 41 69 0.35
Sea squirt ci2 414 454 14 273 1216 589 4.13
Rata rn4 463 787 40 428 110 188 0.47
Cattlea bosTau2 536 939 27 102 251 302 1.11
Doga canFam2 203 772 16 956 31 54 0.32
Chickena galGal2 299 931 21 426 37 66 0.31
Zebrafisha danRer4 522 259 23 809 185 282 1.18

aDue to the relatively small amount of available ESTs compared to their genome size for these species, the absolute numbers reported for these five species may be low and the percentages may not be accurate. However, the candidate trans-SAs identified should still be reliable.

bPrevious papers reported the number and percentages of genes forming cis-SAs in terms of clusters or transcriptional forests. Here, we reported the number and percentage in terms of TUs.