Abstract
The present article is intended to inform paediatricians about the associations between ambient air pollution and adverse health outcomes in children within the context of current epidemiological evidence.
The majority of the current literature pertains to adverse respiratory health outcomes, including asthma, other respiratory symptoms, and deficits in lung function and growth, as well as exposure to ambient levels of criteria air pollutants. In addition to the above, the present article highlights mortality, pregnancy outcomes, vitamin D deficiency and alteration in the immune system of children.
Some of the data on the impact of improved air quality on children’s health are provided, including the reduction of air pollution in former East Germany following the reunification of Germany, as well as the reduction in the rates of childhood asthma events during the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, Georgia, due to a reduction in local motor vehicle traffic. However, there are many other toxic air pollutants that are regularly released into the air. These pollutants, which are not regularly monitored and have not been adequately researched, are also potentially harmful to children.
Significant morbidity and mortality is attributed to ambient air pollution, resulting in a significant economic cost to society. As Canada’s cities grow, air pollution issues need to be a priority in order to protect the health of children and support sustainable development for future generations.
Keywords: Air pollution, Children, Environmental health, Health outcomes
Abstract
Le présent article vise à informer les pédiatres des associations entre la pollution atmosphérique et les issues de santé négatives chez les enfants, compte tenu des données épidémiologiques courantes.
La majorité des publications portent sur les effets négatifs en santé respiratoire, y compris l’asthme, les autres symptômes respiratoires et les déficits de la fonction et de la croissance pulmonaires, ainsi qu’une exposition aux niveaux ambiants d’émissions de pollution atmosphérique. Outre ce qui précède, le présent article souligne la mortalité, les issues des grossesses, la carence en vitamine D et l’altération du système immunitaire des enfants.
Certaines des données sur les répercussions de l’amélioration de la qualité de l’air sur la santé des enfants sont présentées, y compris la diminution de la pollution atmosphérique dans l’ancienne Allemagne de l’Est après la réunification de l’Allemagne, ainsi que la réduction des taux de crises d’asthme chez les enfants pendant les Olympiques d’été 1996 à Atlanta, en Géorgie, en raison de la diminution de la circulation de véhicules automobiles. Cependant, de nombreux autres polluants atmosphériques toxiques sont régulièrement libérés dans l’atmosphère. Ces polluants, qui ne sont pas surveillés régulièrement et qui n’ont pas fait l’objet de recherches suffisantes, peuvent également être dommageables pour les enfants.
On attribue une morbidité et une mortalité marquées à la pollution atmosphérique, associées à des coûts économiques importants pour la société. À mesure que les villes canadiennes prennent de l’expansion, la question de la pollution atmosphérique doit être une priorité, afin de protéger la santé des enfants et de soutenir le développement durable pour les prochaines générations.
An interest in the study of the adverse health effects of ambient air pollution in children has been evident in the scientific literature in recent years. The Committee on Environmental Health of the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a policy statement in 2004 emphasizing the link between ambient air pollution and children’s health (1). Children are known to be more vulnerable to the adverse health effects of air pollution due to their higher minute ventilation, immature immune system, involvement in vigorous activities, the longer periods of time they spend outdoors (2,3) and the continuing development of their lungs during the early postneonatal period (2,4).
A large number of epidemiological studies have reported an association between exposure to criteria air pollutants and several morbidity (5,6) and mortality (7,8) outcomes in children. Criteria air pollutants consist of six air pollutants that are regulated on the basis of their potential to cause adverse health and/or environmental effects: ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide and lead. In the present commentary, we intend to highlight the adverse health outcomes associated with exposure to criteria air pollutants in children. The purpose of the present article is to inform paediatricians about the current epidemiological evidence on the associations between ambient air pollution and adverse health outcomes in children.
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS ON CHILDREN’S HEALTH
Mortality outcomes
Ambient air pollution has been linked to increased mortality in children (8) and adults (9). Sudden infant death syndrome, a leading cause of postneonatal mortality in Canada (10) and other developed countries (11), has been associated with exposure to criteria air pollutants (12). In a systematic review of the literature on the association between ambient air pollution and infant mortality, Glinianaia et al (7) observed a consistent and significant association between PM and postneonatal mortality due to respiratory causes, as well as sudden infant death syndrome. Other studies have reported a significant relationship between ambient air levels of criteria air pollutants and mortality in children younger than five years of age (13).
Adverse pregnancy outcomes
Ambient levels of criteria air pollutants have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including premature birth, low birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation (14), abnormal birth length, abnormal head circumference (15) and small size for gestational age (16). However, no specific trimester has been identified as the most vulnerable period of gestation during which air pollution might be most harmful to the fetus.
Increased risk of birth defects
Currently, only one study has investigated the effects of ambient air pollution on birth defects. Ritz et al (17) observed a significant association between prenatal exposure to carbon monoxide and cardiac ventricular septal defects, while O3 was associated with an increased risk of aortic artery and valve defects, as well as pulmonary artery and valve defects.
Adverse respiratory heath outcomes
Exposure to ambient levels of criteria air pollutants has been associated with several acute and chronic adverse respiratory health effects in both asthmatic (18) and nonasthmatic (19) children, although asthmatic children have been shown to be more susceptible to the adverse health effects of ambient air pollution (18). Several studies have linked ambient air pollution to an increased prevalence of asthma symptoms (20,21), as well as an increased incidence (22) and prevalence (22,23) of childhood asthma, particularly among children who regularly engage in sporting activities and those with increased asthma medication use (20,21,24), increased asthma emergency department visits (6,21,25,26) and increased hospitalization due to asthma (27–29). Other studies have documented an inverse relationship between exposure to criteria air pollutants and lung function in both asthmatic (30) and nonasthmatic (19) children. There is evidence suggesting that current levels of ambient air pollutants may cause deficits in lung function growth in children (31–33). Ambient air pollution has been associated with increased reporting of respiratory symptoms among nonasthmatic children (34), as well as increased respiratory hospital admissions (34,35) and emergency department visits (36) for children.
School absenteeism
Although the results from epidemiological studies suggest that both short-term and long-term exposure to ambient air pollution may contribute to illness-related school absenteeism, these data are not consistent. Day-to-day changes in the levels of criteria air pollutants (PM10, SO2, NO2 and O3) have been associated with illness-related absenteeism (37–40), while short-term changes in O3 and SO2 have been linked to respiratory illness-related elementary school absenteeism (37,38). However, Park et al (39) did not observe a correlation between varying ambient air levels of NO2 and illness-related school absences. Rondeau et al (40) reported a link between long-term exposure to ambient levels of O3 and illness-related school absenteeism, but did not find anything for acute exposure. In addition, the investigators did not find any significant association between daily levels of ambient air pollution and respiratory illness-related school absenteeism (40).
Altered immunity
Exposure to ambient levels of criteria air pollutants has been shown to cause alteration in the immune system in children. Leonardi et al (41) studied the impact of ambient air pollution on the immune system of school children between nine and 11 years of age in 17 cities in Europe and found that ambient air pollution may alter both cellular and humoral immunity in children. However, a study conducted in Chile by Ruiz et al (42) found no association between ambient air pollution and the humoral immune system in children. Emerging evidence from animal toxicological studies suggest that ambient air pollution may cause suppression of host immunity (43,44).
Increased risk of vitamin D-deficiency rickets
In the tropics, children who live in regions with higher levels of ambient air pollution have been shown to be at increased risk of developing vitamin D-deficiency rickets compared with those residing in less polluted areas (45). The amount of solar radiation in the ultraviolet B range reaching ground level has been found to be inversely related to the level of ambient air pollution (haze). Ultraviolet B radiation emitted by the sun is required for the conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol to cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) (45).
The effects of improved air quality on children’s health
A decline in ambient air levels of SO2 and total suspended particulates in former East Germany following the reunification of Germany led to improvements in the results of lung function studies in children and a reduction in the prevalence of respiratory illnesses such as bronchitis, sinusitis and frequent colds (46). Children in the United States who relocated to states with lower levels of ambient air PM10 showed increased growth in lung function studies, while those who relocated to states with higher PM10 experienced decreased growth in lung function (47). A 27.9% decline in daily peak O3 concentrations from 81.3 parts per billion to 58.6 parts per billion during the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, Georgia, resulted in a significant reduction in the rates of childhood asthma events (48). Wong et al (49) used a benefit-cost analysis framework to assess the impact of criteria air pollutants on children’s health and to quantify the health and economic benefits associated with a reduction in criteria air pollutant levels; they reported substantial health and economic benefits following a reduction in air pollutant levels.
Other air pollutants
Although the present article is restricted to the health effects of criteria air pollutants, there are many other toxic air pollutants regularly released into the air that have the potential to harm children (50). Studies are appearing in the literature identifying potential exposures and health effects (51–53). The effects of air pollutants on genetic material are being investigated (54,55). Further studies may lead to a better understanding of not only childhood disorders, but possibly adult ones too.
CONCLUSIONS
Significant morbidity and mortality in children is attributed to ambient air pollution at great economic cost to society. As our cities grow and our population increases, we need to be aware of air pollution and its effects on children. Further studies are needed in Canada to improve our understanding of air pollution on the health of children to aide policy-makers in decisions that relate to the sustainability of development.
Consideration needs to be given to emerging science on nonregulated pollutants that may be affecting the health of children today and may also be endangering future generations by affecting genetic material. Local data from different environments across Canada will help paediatricians in their roles as clinicians, educators and advocates. Significant research opportunity needs to be created to collect these data. This challenge needs to be addressed if we are to protect the health of children in the coming generations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors sincerely thank Bronia Heilik (BA, BLS) and Elizabeth Mortimer for library assistance, and Michelle Huculak for her administrative assistance.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kim JJ American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Environmental Health. Ambient air pollution: Health hazards to children. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1699–707. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dixon JK. Kids need clean air: Air pollution and children’s health. Fam Community Health. 2002;24:9–26. doi: 10.1097/00003727-200201000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gilliland FD, McConnell R, Peters J, Gong H., Jr A theoretical basis for investigating ambient air pollution and children’s respiratory health. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107(Suppl):403–7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107s3403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pinkerton KE, Joad JP. The mammalian respiratory system and critical windows of exposure for children’s health. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(Suppl 3):457–62. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s3457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lacasana M, Esplugues A, Ballester F. Exposure to ambient air pollution and prenatal and early childhood health effects. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20:183–99. doi: 10.1007/s10654-004-3005-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee JT, Kim H, Song H, et al. Air pollution and asthma among children in Seoul, Korea. Epidemiology. 2004;13:481–4. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200207000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Bell R, Pless-Mulloli T, Howel D. Does particulate air pollution contribute to infant death? A systematic review. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1365–71. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ha EH, Lee JT, Kim H, et al. Infant susceptibility of mortality to air pollution in Seoul, South Korea. Pediatrics. 2003;111:284–90. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.2.284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wong TW, Tam WS, Yu TS, Wong AH. Associations between daily mortalities from respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and air pollution in Hong Kong, China. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:30–5. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.1.30. Erratum in 2002;59:650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rusen ID, Liu S, Sauve R, Joseph KS, Kramer MS. Sudden infant death syndrome in Canada: Trends in rates and risk factors, 1985–1998. Chronic Dis Can. 2004;25:1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Malloy MH, MacDorman M. Changes in the classification of sudden unexpected infant deaths: United States, 1992–2001. Pediatrics. 2005;115:1247–53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dales R, Burnett RT, Smith-Doiron M, Stieb DM, Brook JR. Air pollution and sudden infant death syndrome. Pediatrics. 2004;113:e628–31. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Conceicao GM, Miraglia SG, Kishi HS, Saldiva PH, Singer JM. Air pollution and child mortality: A time-series study in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(Suppl 3):347–50. doi: 10.1289/ehp.109-1240551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, Burnett RT. Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1773–8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jedrychowski W, Bendkowska I, Flak E, et al. Estimated risk for altered fetal growth resulting from exposure to fine particles during pregnancy: An epidemiologic prospective cohort study in Poland. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1398–402. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Parker JD, Woodruff TJ, Basu R, Schoendorf KC. Air pollution and birth weight among term infants in California. Pediatrics. 2005;115:121–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ritz B, Yu F, Fruin S, Chapa G, Shaw GM, Harris JA. Ambient air pollution and risk of birth defects in Southern California. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:17–25. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aekplakorn W, Loomis D, Vichit-Vadakan N, Shy C, Wongtim S, Vitayanon P. Acute effect of sulphur dioxide from a power plant on pulmonary function of children, Thailand. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:854–61. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim JH, Lim DH, Kim JK, Jeong SJ, Son BK. Effects of particulate matter (PM10) on the pulmonary function of middle-school children. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20:42–5. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gent JF, Triche EW, Holford TR, et al. Association of low-level ozone and fine particles with respiratory symptoms in children with asthma. JAMA. 2003;290:1859–65. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.14.1859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ostro B, Lipsett M, Mann J, Braxton-Owens H, White M. Air pollution and exacerbation of asthma in African-American children in Los Angeles. Epidemiology. 2001;12:200–8. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200103000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McConnell R, Berhane K, Gilliland F, et al. Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: A cohort study. Lancet. 2002;359:386–91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07597-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shima M, Nitta Y, Ando M, Adachi M. Effects of air pollution on the prevalence and incidence of asthma in children. Arch Environ Health. 2002;57:529–35. doi: 10.1080/00039890209602084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Slaughter JC, Lumbley T, Koening JQ, Shapiro GG. Effects of ambient air pollution on symptoms severity and medication use in children with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003;4:346–53. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61681-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fauroux B, Sampil M, Quenel P, Lemoullec Y. Ozone: A trigger for hospital pediatric asthma emergency room visits. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000;30:41–6. doi: 10.1002/1099-0496(200007)30:1<41::aid-ppul7>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tolbert PE, Mulholland JA, Macintosh DL, et al. Air quality and pediatric emergency room visits for asthma in Atlanta, Georgia. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:798–810. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen Y, Lin M, Burnett RT, Villeneuve PJ, Kreweski D. Effects of short-term exposure to gaseous pollution on asthma hospitalization in children: A bi-directional case-crossover analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:50–5. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.1.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lin M, Chen Y, Villeneuve PJ, et al. Gaseous air pollution and asthma hospitalization of children with low household income in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:294–303. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Burnett RT, Smith-Doiron M, Stieb D, Raizenne ME, Brook JR, Dales RE. Association between ozone and hospitalization for acute respiratory diseases in children less than 2 years of age. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:444–52. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.5.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Peled R, Fridger M, Bolitin A, et al. Fine particles and meteorological conditions are associated with lung function in children with asthma living near two power plants. Public Health. 2005;119:418–25. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gauderman J, Avol E, Gilland FD, et al. The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1051–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gauderman WJ, Gilliland GF, Vora H, et al. Association between air pollution and lung function growth in southern California children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:76–84. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2111021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ihorst G, Frischer T, Horak F, et al. Long- and medium-term ozone effects on lung growth including a broad spectrum of exposure. Eur Respir J. 2004;23:292–9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00021704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Preutthipan A, Udomsubpayakul U, Chaisupamongkollarp T, Pentamwa P. Effect of PM10 pollution in Bangkok on children with and without asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004;37:187–92. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yang Q, Chen Y, Shi Y, Burnett RT, McGrail KM, Krewski D. Association between ozone and respiratory admissions among children and elderly in Vancouver, Canada. Inhal Toxicol. 2003;15:1297–308. doi: 10.1080/08958370390241768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lin CA, Martins MA, Farhat SC, et al. Air pollution and respiratory illness of children in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1999;13:475–88. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1999.00210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gilland FD, Berhane K, Rappaport E. The effects of ambient air on school absenteeism due to respiratory illness. Epidemiology. 2001;12:43–54. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200101000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hwang J, Chen Y, Wang J, Lai Y, Yang C, Chan C. Subject-domain approach to study of air pollution effects on school children’s illness absence. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:67–74. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Park H, Lee B, Ha EH, Lee JT, Kim H, Hong YC. Association of air pollution with school absenteeism due to illness. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1235–9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.12.1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rondeau V, Berhane K, Thomas DC. A three-level model for binary time-series data: The effects of air pollution on school absences in the Southern California Children’s Health Study. Stat Med. 2005;24:1103–15. doi: 10.1002/sim.1980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leonardi GS, Haouthuijs D, Steerenberg PA, et al. Immune biomarkers in relation to exposure to particulate matter: A cross-sectional survey in 17 cities of Central Europe. Inhal Toxicol. 2000;4:1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ruiz F, Videla LA, Vargas N, et al. Air pollution impact on phagocytic capacity of peripheral blood macrophages and antioxidant activity of plasma among school children. Arch Environ Health. 1988;43:286–91. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1988.10545951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kleinman MT, Sioutas C, Chang MC, Boere AJ, Cassee FR. Ambient fine and coarse particle suppression of alveolar macrophage functions. Toxicol Lett. 2003;137:151–8. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00398-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yin XJ, Dong CC, Ma JY, et al. Suppression of cell-mediated immune responses to Listeria infection by repeated exposure to diesel exhaust particles in Brown Norway rats. Toxicol Sci. 2004;77:263–71. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfh035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Agarwal KS, Mughal MZ, Upadhay P, Bery JL, Mawer EB, Puliyel JM. The impact of atmospheric pollution on vitamin D status of infants and toddlers in Delhi, India. Arch Dis Child. 2002;87:111–3. doi: 10.1136/adc.87.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Heinrich J, Hoelscher B, Frye C, et al. Improved air quality in reunified Germany and decreases in respiratory symptoms. Epidemiology. 2002;13:394–401. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200207000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Avol EL, Gauderman WJ, Tan SM, London SJ, Peters JM. Respiratory effects of relocating to areas with differing air pollution levels. Am J Respir Care Med. 2001;164:2067–72. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.11.2102005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Friedman MS, Powel KE, Hutwagener L, Graham LM, Teague WG. Impact of changes in transportation and commuting behaviors during the 1996 Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta on air quality and childhood asthma. JAMA. 2001;285:897–905. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.7.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wong EY, Gohike J, Griffith WC, Farrow S, Faustman EM. Assessing the health benefits of air pollution reduction for children. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:226–32. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Etzel RA, Balk SJ, editors. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Environmental Health. Pediatric Environmental Health. 2. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Raaschou-Nielsen O, Lohse C, Thomsen BL, Skov H, Olsen JH. Ambient air levels and the exposure of children to benzene, toluene, and xylenes in Denmark. Environ Res. 1997;75:149–59. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1997.3792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Takser L, Mergler D, Hellier G, Sahuquillo J, Huel G. Manganese, monoamine metabolite levels at birth, and child psychomotor development. Neurotoxicology. 2003;24:667–74. doi: 10.1016/S0161-813X(03)00058-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Steffen C, Auclerc MF, Auvrignon A, et al. Acute childhood leukaemia and environmental exposure to potential sources of benzene and other hydrocarbons: A case-control study. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:773–8. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.010868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bocskay KA, Tang D, Orjuela MA, Liu X, Warburton DP, Perera FP. Chromosomal aberrations in cord blood are associated with prenatal exposure to carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:506–11. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Perera F, Hemminki K, Jedrychowski W, et al. In utero DNA damage from environmental pollution is associated with somatic gene mutation in newborns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:1134–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]