Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Vascul Pharmacol. 2008 Apr 3;49(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2008.03.005

Table 3.

Maximum contraction and estimated EC50 values for ET-1 (10 pM – 100 nM) - induced contraction in thoracic aorta from WT and sl/sl rats under control conditions, ETA receptor blockade, ETB receptor blockade and ETA plus ETB receptor blockade.

Aorta WT Aorta sl/sl

Treatment Max contraction
[% PE (10 μM)]
EC50
(nM)
Max contraction
[% PE (10 μM)]
EC50
(nM)
Vehicle 149±10 11.70±1.31 148±9 12.36±1.23
Atrasentan (10 nM) 92±22* 44.00±0.5* 50±19* 45.73±2.27*
BQ-788 (100 nM) 176±25 13.51±2.26 137±18 10.97±1.00
Atrasentan (10 nM)
+ BQ-788 (100 nM)
81±16* 45.68±3.72* 65±21* 48.56±0.83*

Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. Atrasentan, ETA receptor antagonist; BQ-788, ETB receptor antagonist; PE, phenylephrine; WT, homozygous wildtype rats; sl/sl, homozygous ETB receptor deficient rats.

*

represents a statistically significant difference from control (p<0.05)

represents a statistically significant difference from BQ-788 (p<0.05).