Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Sep;26(9):1186–1193. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802071

Table 2.

Differences in individual activity and intake variables for mothers and fathers in the obesigenic and non-obesigenic clusters

Non-obesigenic cluster n = 98 Obesigenic cluster n = 94 P-value
Activity patterns
Mothers’ sport participationa 41.1 (8.2) 36.5 (7.6) < 0.0001
Fathers’ sport participationa 46.6 (8.1) 39.4 (9.0) < 0.0001
Mothers’ weekly frequency of exercise 3.5 (1.7) 2.4 (1.9) < 0.0001
Fathers’ weekly frequency of exercise 3.7 (1.8) 1.9 (2.0) < 0.0001
Mothers’ enjoyment of activityb 1.9 (0.8) 1.6 (0.6) < 0.01
Fathers’ enjoyment of activityb 2.3 (0.7) 1.6 (0.7) < 0.0001
Dietary patterns
Mothers’ total energy intakec −147.4 (566) 149.6 (736) < 0.01
Fathers’ total energy intakec −290.0 (554) 281.5 (741) < 0.0001
Mothers’ percent intake as fat 31.7 (6.7) 39.6 (5.6) < 0.0001
Fathers’ percent intake as fat 32.9 (7.3) 38.7 (5.9) < 0.0001
Mothers’ dietary disinhibitiond 2.7 (0.7) 2.9 (0.8) < 0.10
Fathers’ dietary disinhibitiond 2.4 (0.6) 2.3 (0.6) NS
a

Sport participation = Sum of (no. of activities×frequency of participation from 1 = never to 5 = always).

b

Enjoyment = ‘I exercise for fun’ (1 = does not describe me to 3 = really describes me).

c

Energy intake scores were residualized for weight in kilograms (0 = energy intake as expected for body weight; positive scores = greater than expected energy intake; negative scores = less than expected energy intake). Mean daily energy intake (kcal) unadjusted for body weight was 1633 (±553) and 1971 (±747) for mothers in the non-obesigenic and obesigenic clusters respectively. The corresponding values for fathers were 1860 (±624) and 2411 (±745).

d

Disinhibition = score on disinhibition subscale of the Dutch Eating Behaviors Questionnaire (range = 1 – 5 with 5 indicating high levels of disinhibition).