Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Sep;26(9):1186–1193. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802071

Table 3.

Cluster validation: assessing cluster differences on mean BMI and skinfold thickness

Non-obesigenic cluster n = 98 Obesigenic cluster n = 94 P-value not controlling for parent BMI P-value controlling for mothers’ BMI P-value controlling for fathers’ BMI
Parents’ BMI
Mothers’ BMI when girls age 5 25.1 (4.6) 27.7 (6.5) <0.05
Fathers’ BMI when girls age 5 27.5 (3.6) 28.6 (4.8) NS
Mothers’ BMI when girls age 7 25.5 (4.9) 28.1 (6.9) <0.01
Fathers’ BMI when girls age 7 27.7 (3.4) 29.1 (4.9) <0.05
Girls’ BMI and skinfold thickness
BMI at age 5a 15.7 (1.3) 15.9 (1.4) NS NS NS
Skinfold thickness at age 5 16.4 (3.9) 17.7 (5.1) <0.05 NS < 0.05
BMI at age 7b 16.2 (2.0) 16.9 (2.3) <0.05 <0.10 < 0.10
Skinfold thickness at age 7 17.4 (6.2) 19.6 (7.3) <0.05 <0.05 < 0.10
Change in BMI from age 5 to 7 0.5 (1.0) 1.0 (1.4) <0.01 <0.05 < 0.05
Change in skinfolds from age 5 to 7 0.90 (3.0) 2.0 (3.7) <0.10 <0.10 < 0.10

For all analyses assessing differences in changes scores, the variable at time 1 was entered as a control variable.

a

The corresponding mean BMI percentiles based on the CDC 2000 growth charts34 are 58.7 and 60.7 for the non-obesigenic and obesigenic clusters, respectively.

b

The corresponding mean BMI percentiles based on the CDC 2000 growth charts34 are 55.3 and 63.4 for the non-obesigenic and obesigenic clusters, respectively.