Table 3.
Hierarchical regression predicting girls’ change in BMI from age 5 to 7 y
Variables entered | P-value at entry | r2 | Δr2 | F-test for Δr2 | d.f. | P-value for Δr2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1: control variables | 0.16 | 0.16 | 7.46 | 4 | 0.0001 | |
Girls’ BMI at age 5 | 0.0001 | |||||
Mothers’ education | 0.51 | |||||
Fathers’ education | 0.95 | |||||
Family income | 0.77 | |||||
| ||||||
Step 2: parent weight status | 0.19 | 0.03 | 6.53 | 3 | 0.09 | |
Family risk of overweight | 0.03 | |||||
Mothers’ change in BMI | 0.07 | |||||
Fathers’ change in BMI | 0.13 | |||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
Step 3: parent physical activity | 0.23 | 0.04 | 5.96 | 4 | 0.25 | |
Mothers’ frequency of activity | 0.34 | |||||
Fathers’ frequency of activity | 0.34 | |||||
Mothers’ enjoyment of activity | 0.99 | |||||
Fathers’ enjoyment of activity | 0.08 | |||||
| ||||||
Step 4: parent dietary intake | 0.29 | 0.06 | 12.61 | 4 | 0.025 | |
Mothers’ energy intakea | 0.52 | |||||
Fathers’ energy intakea | 0.08 | |||||
Mothers’ percentage fat intake | 0.72 | |||||
Fathers’ percentage fat intake | 0.85 | |||||
| ||||||
Step 5: girls’ physical activity | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0 | 2 | NS | |
Girls’ activity relative to others | 0.81 | |||||
Girls’ tendency toward activity | 0.93 | |||||
| ||||||
Step 6: girls’ dietary intake | 0.32 | 0.03 | 4.66 | 2 | 0.10 | |
Girls’ energy intakea | 0.70 | |||||
Girls’ percentage fat intake | 0.02 | |||||
| ||||||
Final model | 0.26 | NA | 9.27 | 6 | 0.0001 | |
Girls’ BMI at age 5 | 0.0001 | |||||
Family risk of overweight | 0.005 | |||||
Mothers’ change in BMI | 0.05 | |||||
Fathers’ enjoyment of activity | 0.01 | |||||
Fathers’ energy intakea | 0.09 | |||||
Girls’ percentage fat intake | 0.01 |
Energy intake controls for body weight.